Bilen, SelmaTunca, Murat2025-05-102025-05-1020231432-69811436-377110.1007/s00784-023-05387-32-s2.0-85181204063https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05387-3https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/15438Tunca, Murat/0000-0002-9157-9390ObjectivesWe aimed to determine safe areas to apply miniscrews in the interradicular region of the maxilla and mandible in individuals with various sagittal skeletal malocclusions.Materials and methodsCone beam-computed tomography images of 159 individuals were used. Individuals were divided into three groups: Class I, Class II, and Class III. In the sagittal plane, 3-6-9-mm apical sections were determined from the alveolar crest apex. The buccal cortical bone thickness, interradicular distance, and buccolingual bone distances were measured.ResultsIn the buccal cortical bone thickness, we observed statistically significant differences between the classes except for the 1-1 region in the maxilla and all regions and sections in the mandible (p < 0.05). The differences in the buccolingual bone distance between classes were statistically significant, except for the 3-mm and 6-mm sections in the 3-4 and 4-5 regions of the maxilla, the 9-mm sections in the 1-2 and 2-3 regions, the 6-mm and 9-mm sections in the 3-4 region, and the 6-mm section in the 4-5 regions of the mandible (p < 0.05). The differences in the interradicular bone distance were statistically significant between the classes in all regions and sections of the mandible except the 6-mm sections in the 1-2 region and in all sections of the maxilla except the 6-mm sections in the 3-4 region (p < 0.05).ConclusionsWe observed significant differences in the buccal cortical bone thickness, interradicular bone distance, and buccolingual bone distance among individuals.Clinical relevanceUnderstanding the anatomy of interradicular regions and preventing complications.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessBuccal Cortical Bone DistanceBuccolingual Bone DistanceInterradicular Bone DistanceMiniscrewSafe AreasArticle281Q2Q138158507WOS:001132786300004