Suvak, BurakKekilli, MuratBeyazit, YavuzOkten, SarperTanoglu, AlpaslanSasmaz, Nurgul2025-05-102025-05-1020171895-57701897-431710.5114/pg.2016.632842-s2.0-85016940588https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2016.63284https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/12134Tanoglu, Alpaslan/0000-0002-7477-6640Introduction: Video endoscopic diagnosis of gastric varices is particularly limited, owing to the deep submucosal or subserosal location of the varices and the normal appearance of the overlying mucosa. Aim: We present and emphasise the value of computerised tomography (CT) examination in the early detection of gastric varices (GVs). Material and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 216 consecutive patients with cirrhosis were evaluated at the Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital between September 2008 and March 2011. Results: One hundred and thirty patients with cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the male (88 cases) patients was 59.45 +/- 2.42 years, and the mean age of the female (42 cases) patients was 56.29 +/- 1.14 years. Computerised tomography identified oesophageal varices (EVs) in 103/130 patients, and endoscopy identified EVs in 103/130 patients. Computerised tomography identified GVs in 86/130 patients, and endoscopy identified GVs in 26/130 patients. After endoscopic elastic band ligation (EBL), CT identified GVs in 22/26 patients, and endoscopy identified GVs in 7/26 patients. Conclusions: Gastric varices lie in the submucosa, deeper than EVs, and distinguishing GVs from gastric rugae may be dif.cult with video endoscopy. This study demonstrated that CT is a sensitive method for early detection of GVs and has been used previously in the evaluation of GVs.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessComputerised TomographyEndoscopyGastric VaricesArticle121N/AQ3343728337234WOS:000396726500006