Aslan, FiratBinici, SerhatBeger, OrhanEryilmaz, IklilTahiroglu, VeyselYesilyurt, DegercanKotan, Mehmet C.2026-01-302026-01-3020261049-22751536-373210.1097/SCS.0000000000012045https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012045https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/29677Yeşilyurt, Değercan/0000-0001-6938-2076;Objective:The management of thyroid nodules is outlined in various clinical guidelines. While the American Thyroid Association guideline provides more systematic algorithms for thyroid nodules smaller than 4 cm in diameter, there is no consensus on the management of nodules >= 4 cm. This study aims to contribute to this topic by evaluating the clinical data of patients who underwent thyroidectomy for nodules measuring >= 4 cm.Methods:This study included 199 patients who underwent thyroidectomy due to thyroid nodules measuring >= 4 cm in diameter. Patients were evaluated based on age, sex, preoperative, postoperative day 1, and at least 1-month postoperative calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, maximum nodule diameter, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) status, and final pathology data.Results:A total of 199 patients (28 men, 171 women; mean age: 46.52 +/- 13.82 y) were included in the study. Malignancy was identified in 17.6% of the cases. Nodule size was significantly larger in male patients (P=0.017) and in malignant lesions, particularly those >= 4 cm. FNAB was performed in 39.2% of the patients; there was no statistically significant association between FNAB performance and age group, sex, or pathology results. However, false-negative FNAB results were detected in 25% of malignant cases, indicating the limited sensitivity of FNAB, especially in nodules >= 4 cm.Conclusion:Thyroid nodules measuring >= 4 cm may warrant surgical intervention regardless of whether FNAB was performed or reported as benign, due to their relatively higher rates of malignancy and associated complications.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessFine-Needle Aspiration BiopsyThyroid NoduleThyroid SurgeryArticle