Browsing by Author "Arvas, Hayati"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Clinical Utility of Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) in Predicting Prognosis of Endometrial Cancer(MDPI, 2025) Onal Kalkan, Nurhan; Urakci, Zuhat; Mermit Ercek, Berrak; Bilen, Erkan; Arvas, Hayati; Akkus, Mehmet HadiBackground: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. While early-stage disease has favorable outcomes, advanced or recurrent EC remains associated with poor prognosis. Novel prognostic markers are needed to refine risk stratification. Systemic inflammation-based indices such as Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) have shown prognostic potential in solid tumors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 78 patients with endometrioid EC who had undergone hysterectomy with adnexectomy and lymphadenectomy. Demographic, clinicopathological, and laboratory data were extracted from electronic medical records. PIV, SII, and SIRI were calculated from the preoperative complete blood counts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, while prognostic factors were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: The median age was 59 years, and 64.1% of the patients presented with early-stage disease. A high PIV (>= 802) was significantly associated with a shorter overall survival (64 vs. 111 months, p < 0.001). PIV demonstrated the highest discriminatory accuracy (AUC = 0.776), followed by the SII (0.747) and SIRI (0.718). Univariate analysis identified that age, grade, LVSI, PNI, stage, distant metastasis, and high PIV, SII, SIRI, and NLR were predictors of poor survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed grade, distant metastasis and SIRI >= 1.5 as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Inflammation-based indices, particularly PIV and SIRI, correlated with survival outcomes in patients with EC. The SIRI retained an independent prognostic value, whereas PIV showed a strong discriminatory capacity. Incorporating these indices into established risk models may improve prognostic precision and support individualized management.Article Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cdk4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer: a Real-World Cohort Study(Karger, 2024) Karhan, Ogur; Ileri, Serdar; Urakci, Zuhat; Arvas, Hayati; Kilic, Delyadil Karakas; Sezgin, Yasin; Tunc, SezaiIntroduction: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the concurrent use of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether PPI use interferes with the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, real-world study included 205 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patient data were collected from January 2020 to August 2023. Patients who received either ribociclib or palbociclib, with or without a PPI, were included. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with mPFS were analyzed using Cox regression. Results: Among the patients, 100 received palbociclib and 105 received ribociclib. In the palbociclib group, 40 patients (40%) used a PPI, and 60 (60%) did not. The mPFS was 16.1 months for patients with a PPI versus 22.2 months for those without (p = 0.26). In the ribociclib group, 44 patients used a PPI and 61 did not use a PPI. The median PFS was comparable between patients receiving PPIs and those not receiving PPIs (19.3 months and 20.7 months, respectively). Poor PFS was associated with liver metastasis, brain metastasis, and high Ki-67. Conclusion: Concomitant use of PPIs with ribociclib or palbociclib did not affect the efficacy of either CDK4/6 inhibitor. PPIs can be administered alongside these medications when clinically indicated. (c) 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.
