Browsing by Author "Hamdard, Jamshid"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Characteristic Features and Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases: Multicenter Experience
(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2025) Hamdard, Jamshid; Bilici, Ahmet; Sakin, Abdullah; Kahraman, Seda; Yasin, Ayse Irem; Kalaci, Ender; Seker, Mesut
We evaluated the incidence, clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer and bone metastases. The medical records of 110 patients with bone metastases were retrospectively analyzed. In our study, the incidence of bone metastases was 3.2%. The median patient age was 60 years. A total of 68 (61.8%) patients exhibited synchronous metastases, and 42 (38.2%) patients developed metachronous metastases. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were high in 54 (49%) patients. At the median follow-up time of 9.8 months, median PFS and OS times were 4.7 and 6.3 months, respectively. The median interval from the diagnosis to bone metastases was 9.3 months. Univariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) >= 2, stage at diagnosis, time of metastases, number of metastases, presence of extraskeletal metastases, use of zoledronic acid treatment, palliative chemotherapy post-bone metastases and radiotherapy to bone metastases were significant prognostic indicators for PFS. Additionally, ECOG PS >= 2, stage at diagnosis, time of metastases, number of metastases, presence of extraskeletal metastases, zoledronic acid treatment, palliative chemotherapy post-bone metastases, and radiotherapy to bone metastases significantly influenced OS. Moreover, in multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, time of metastases, presence of extra-bone metastases, and the use of palliative chemotherapy after bone metastases were found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS. Moreover, ECOG PS, time of metastases, and use of palliative chemotherapy after bone metastases were significantly independent prognostic indicators for OS. Our findings show that the presence of synchronous metastases, use of palliative chemotherapy, use of zoledronic acid after bone metastases, and ALP level within the normal range were significantly associated with prolonged OS in gastric cancer patients with bone metastases.
The Conversion Ofrasstatus in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients After First-Line Biological Agent Treatment
(Wiley, 2021) Arici, Serdar; Hamdard, Jamshid; Sakin, Abdullah; Sengiz Erhan, Selma; Atci, Muhammed Mustafa; Cekin, Ruhper; Bilici, Ahmet
Aim The aim was to investigate theRASdiscordance between initial and recurrent metastasectomy specimens in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) plus biological agents in a first-line setting. Methods Patients who had been treated with CT plus bevacizumab or cetuximab or panitumumab followed by R0 resection for potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were scanned. Among these, patients who developed resectable new metastases after a disease-free interval longer than 6 months were included in the study. We compared theRASmutation status between the first biopsy and the second metastasectomy specimen. Results A total of 82 mCRC patients treated with CT plus biological agents in a first-line setting were included in the study. The first biopsy assessment showed wild-typeRAStumours in 39 (47.6%) patients and mutantRAStumours in 43 (52.4%) patients. The mean time for new operable liver metastasis after R0 resection was 15.5 months. In the second metastasectomy specimens, the numbers of wild-type and mutantRAStumours were 30 (36.6%) and 52 (63.4%), respectively. The comparison with the first biopsy specimens showedRASstatus conversions in 17 (20.7%) patients. Univariate comparison between patients with and withoutRASstatus conversion revealed that grade, pathological T stage, wild-typeRAStumour and longer biological agent use time in the first-line treatment were significant factors forRASconversion. Conclusion Our results suggest that re-biopsy is needed for an optimal second-line treatment decision in mCRC patients regardless of backbone biological agent, especially in patients with wild-typeRASmCRC.
Efficacy and Safety of Folfiri Plus Aflibercept in Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Real-Life Data From Turkish Oncology Group
(Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022) Erol, Cihan; Sendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit; Bilgetekin, Irem; Garbioglu, Duygu Bayir; Hamdard, Jamshid; Akbas, Sinem; Artac, Mehmet
Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial.