Browsing by Author "Kilickap, Saadettin"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Association Between Body Mass Index and Survival in Patients With De Novo Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer(int Scientific information, inc, 2024) Urun, Muslih; Guner, Gurkan; Sezgin, Yasin; Sakin, Abdullah; Kilickap, SaadettinBackground: This retrospective study from a single center included 289 patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2010 to 2017 and aimed to evaluate the effects of body mass index (BMI) on overall survival. Material/Methods: This retrospective study involved 289 patients diagnosed with metastatic-stage NSCLC at a single institution between January 2010 and December 2017. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their BMI at diagnosis: those with a BMI <25 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI >= 25 kg/m(2). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with overall survival. Results: A total of 289 patients (241 men, 48 women) were included in the study, with a mean age of 60.1 +/- 11.1 years. Among them, 175 patients (60.6%) had a BMI less than 25 kg/m(2). Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI, pathological diagnosis, and complete response after first-line treatment were independently associated with survival in patients with lung cancer. Predicted survival time was significantly shorter in the BMI <25 group than in the BMI >= 25 group (9.3 months vs 13.0 months, P<0.05). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that a higher BMI at the time of diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival in patients with de novo metastatic NSCLC. BMI may serve as an important prognostic factor in this patient population. Future prospective, multi-center studies are necessary to further validate the role of BMI in predicting survival outcomes in NSCLC patients across different treatment modalities.Article Efficacy of Immunotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma: a Turkish Oncology Group (Tog) Study(Mdpi, 2025) Kalkan, Ziya; Ebinc, Senar; Arcagok, Murat; Bilici, Ahmet; Yildiz, Ozcan; Kilickap, Saadettin; Kaplan, Muhammet AliBackground and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy across different treatment lines in patients with pleural mesothelioma. It also sought to identify factors influencing the success of immunotherapy, such as histological subtype, PD-L1 expression, type of asbestos exposure, and metastatic status. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with 60 patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. Data on age, gender, histological subtype, and asbestos exposure were collected for all patients and PD-L1 expression was assessed in a subset of patients. Patients received either chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatments, and progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment responses were evaluated. Results: Among the 60 patients, 35 (58.3%) were male and the median age was 59 years. The majority (71.7%) had epithelioid histology and 28.3% had distant metastases. Asbestos exposure was documented in 65% of the cases. PD-L1 expression of >= 1% was found in 13 of 17 patients tested. First-line treatments included immunotherapy for 11 patients and chemotherapy for the others, with immunotherapy achieving median PFS of 9 months versus 6 months for chemotherapy, although the difference was not statistically significant. In third-line treatments, immunotherapy significantly outperformed chemotherapy with median PFS of 6 months compared to 3 months (p = 0.048). Absence of metastasis and prior asbestos exposure in an endemic region were linked to better immunotherapy outcomes. Conclusion: Immunotherapy shows increased efficacy in later treatment lines for pleural mesothelioma, especially for patients without metastases or with prior endemic asbestos exposure. Tailored therapeutic strategies should be further explored in prospective studies.Article Prognostic Significance of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index in Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Retrospective Analysis of 96 Patients(int Scientific information, inc, 2024) Urun, Muslih; Guner, Guerkan; Sezgin, Yasin; Uysal, Emre; Sakin, Abdullah; Kilickap, SaadettinBackground: The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is regarded as a potential indicator of systemic inflammation. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of the ALI in 96 patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Material/Methods: This retrospective study included 96 patients who were diagnosed with extensive stage SCLC in a single institution between 2016 and 2022. The formula for ALI is body mass index (kg/m2)xserum 2 )xserum albumin (g/dL)/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. Patients were divided into low inflammation (ALI >= 32.5) and high inflammation (ALI <32.5) groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional analysis were conducted to assess the association between the ALI and patient prognosis. Results: Median age was 61 (range: 41-82) years. Median follow-up was 9 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (95% CI: 7.75-12.45). A lower ALI score (ALI <32.5) was correlated with a poorer OS than was a higher ALI score (median OS 7 months for ALI <32.5 95% CI: 4.6-9.3 vs 15 months for ALI >= 32.5, 95% CI: 10.6-19.3, P <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, ALI score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, brain metastasis, and bone metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: ALI score is a substantial predictor of survival in SCLC as in other types of cancer types. Patients with a low ALI score have poorer survival. Assessment of ALI can identify lung cancer patients at high risk of poor prognosis and can be a useful prognostic marker in clinical practice.