Utilitarian Moral Agents Are Perceived as Braver and More Moral When Judged in a Foreign Language: Evidence From Tanzania

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Abstract

We examined how language affects moral judgments in a non-WEIRD population. Tanzanian participants (N = 103) evaluated utilitarian agents in moral dilemmas, either in native Chagga or foreign Swahili. Agents were rated significantly more moral and braver when evaluated in a foreign language. Bravery predicted morality more strongly in the foreign language than in the native language. Indirect sacrifices were judged more moral than direct ones, but equally brave. These findings extend the moral foreign language effect to informally acquired languages and highlight methodological implications for cross-cultural research. © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Description

Keywords

Cross-Cultural Research, Foreign Language Effect, Moral Judgment, Research Methodology, Utilitarian Decision-Making

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1

Source

Bilingualism-Language and Cognition

Volume

Issue

Start Page

End Page

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™