YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Effect of Plant Hormones on the Cambial Activity of Cerasus Vulgaris Miller Under Stress Conditions With Zn

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2019

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of 10, 20, 30 ppm hormone mixtures (indole-3-acetic acid + + gibberellic acid + kinetin) with 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1 ppm zinc (Zn) concentrations alone and their mixtures on the cambial activity of sour cherry (Cerasus vulgaris Miller) cuttings were investigated. Morphological and anatomical developments of the plants were observed. The leaves of the plants treated with zinc were found to be greener than the control. Plants treated with zinc faded earlier than the control. The cambial zone thickness, the cambial zone cell line, the radial and tangential lengths of the cambial zone cells decreased with increasing concentrations of zinc and increased with increasing concentrations of hormones. The radial and tangential wall widths of the cambial zone cells increased with increasing zinc concentrations and decreased with increasing hormone concentrations. As a result, in the 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1 ppm Zn concentrations, the cambial zone thickness decreased by 10, 28, 50 and 65%, respectively, compared to the control. Thirty ppm hormone mixture – H.M. (indole-3-acetic acid + gibberellic acid + kinetin) increased the cambial zone thickness by 65, 15, 5% in 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 Zn, respectively, compared to the control. It was found that plant hormones importantly improved the harmful effects of zinc on the cambial activity of the plant cuttings. © 2019 Polish Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Cerasus Vulgaris, Gibberellic Acid, Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Kinetin, Sour Cherry, Zinc

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

WoS Q

N/A

Scopus Q

Q3

Source

Journal of Plant Protection Research

Volume

59

Issue

3

Start Page

304

End Page

323