YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Dosimetric Comparison of 3d-Conformal and Imrt Techniques Used in Radiotherapy of Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study

dc.authorscopusid 57220369315
dc.authorscopusid 57193453129
dc.authorscopusid 36810082100
dc.authorscopusid 35775027600
dc.contributor.author Gul, O.V.
dc.contributor.author Demir, H.
dc.contributor.author Kanyilmaz, G.
dc.contributor.author Cakir, T.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:55:21Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:55:21Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Gul O.V., Selcuk University, Medicine Faculty, Radiation Oncology Department, Konya, Turkey; Demir H., Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Medicine Faculty, Radiation Oncology Department, Van, Turkey; Kanyilmaz G., Necmettin Erbakan University, Medicine Faculty, Radiation Oncology Department, Konya, Turkey; Cakir T., Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Medicine Faculty, Biophysics Department, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract This study aimed to compare three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning techniques commonly used in gastric cancer radiotherapy with dose volume histograms. Computed tomography (CT) images of 20 gastric cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. 3D-CRT, 5F-IMRT and 7F-IMRT treatment plans were created for each patient. The 3 plans were compared on dose volume histogram (DVH). 3D-CRT, 5F-IMRT and 7F-IMRT plans achieved a prescribed dose of 45 Gy for 95% of PTV volume. D95 values were 45.06±0.47 Gy for 3D-CRT, 46.39±0.38 Gy for 5F-IMRT and 45.20±0.11 Gy for 7F-IMRT. In 3D-CRT, 5F-IMRT and 7F-IMRT techniques, the 13 Gy receiving volumes of the right kidney were found to be 35.08+9.59, 36.25+7.97 and 37.03+9.03 respectively. Moreover, the volume of the right kidney receiving a 20 Gy and 30 Gy dose received less dose with 5F-IMRT than with 7F-IMRT. Since each patient's critical organs are at different distances from the target and each technique has its own advantages in terms of critical organs, we suggest that the useful technique should be decided by clinical consensus. © IJCESEN. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.22399/ijcesen.296
dc.identifier.endpage 48 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2149-9144
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85188952320
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 42 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.296
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/3468
dc.identifier.volume 10 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Prof.Dr. İskender AKKURT en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject 3D-Crt en_US
dc.subject Gastric Cancer en_US
dc.subject Imrt en_US
dc.subject Radiotherapy en_US
dc.title Dosimetric Comparison of 3d-Conformal and Imrt Techniques Used in Radiotherapy of Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files