YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Impact of Contrast Agents on Dose Algorithms of Planning Systems

dc.contributor.author Izmirli, M.
dc.contributor.author Cakir, T.
dc.contributor.author Avcu, S.
dc.contributor.author Nart, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:39:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:39:27Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Izmirli, M.; Cakir, T.; Nart, M.] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Van, Turkey; [Avcu, S.] Gazi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Use of contrast agents (CAs) during CT simulation for treatment planing system leads to changes in electron density. In this study we aimed to investigate the effect on calculated dose of various concentrations of CAs on treatment planing systems in different dose calculation algorithms. Materials and Methods: Contrast agent (0.769 mg/ml Iopromid) - water mixtures at concentrations of 0%, 1%, 2%, 5% and 10% in total volume of 500 ml for each were made by using five identical balloons. Calculations were performed by Cobalt-60 and 10 MV linear accelerator devices in CMS XIO treatment planning system. The prescribed dose of 100cGy was given to the center of balloon that is isocenter of SAD technique at 10cm from the surface. The doses at maximum dose depth (dmax) and at 5 cm were calculated according to the separate algorithms by either making or not making a correction for CA, and the results were recorded. Results: In all algorithms, as contrast ratio increases, the dose values at dmax and 5 cm-depth increase accordingly. When the doses at dmax and 5 cm-depth were compared for Linac and Co-60 in all algorithms, it has been shown that the dmax value of Co-60 was higher and the difference was greater in parallel with increasing contrast ratio in comparing with Linac. Conclusion: When required during the planning, the treatment plan should be calculated via providing an electron density correction by contouring the volume retaining CAs along the beam line. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.7508/ijrr.2016.01.004
dc.identifier.endpage 30 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2322-3243
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 25 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.7508/ijrr.2016.01.004
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/14899
dc.identifier.volume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000380177800004
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ijrr-iranian Journal Radiation Res en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Contrast Agent en_US
dc.subject Hounsfield Unit en_US
dc.subject Electron Density en_US
dc.subject Treatment Planing System en_US
dc.subject Radiotherapy en_US
dc.title Impact of Contrast Agents on Dose Algorithms of Planning Systems en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files