YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Adherence To Drop Treatment in Glaucoma Patients and Its Relationship With Progression

dc.contributor.author Özer, Muhammet Derda
dc.contributor.author Seven, Erbil
dc.contributor.author Öcal, Halit
dc.contributor.author Tekin, Serek
dc.contributor.author Batur, Muhammed
dc.contributor.author Yaşar, Tekin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:53:35Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:53:35Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Van Yüzüncü Yil Üni̇versi̇tesi̇,Van Yüzüncü Yil Üni̇versi̇tesi̇,Van Yüzüncü Yil Üni̇versi̇tesi̇,Van Yüzüncü Yil Üni̇versi̇tesi̇,Van Yüzüncü Yil Üni̇versi̇tesi̇,Sağlik Bi̇li̇mleri̇ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To evaluate the adherence of glaucoma patients to eye drop therapy and determine the effects of treatment adherence on disease progression. Materials and Methods: A total of 147 patients followed at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Department of Ophthalmology, between March 2019 and June 2019 were included in the study. Patients were examined and asked questions. Patients underwent peripapillary retinal nerve fi ber layer analysis via optical coherence tomography. Results: It was found that 66% of the patients adhered to eye drop treatment. The most common reasons for non-adherence were forgetting (40%) and running out of eye drop (38%). Correct instillation technique was demonstrated by 59% of the patients. There was signifi cantly less disease progression in adherent patients compared to non-adherent patients (p=0.002) and in patients with correct instillation technique compared to those without (p=0.001). Conclusion: This study showed adherence to eye drop therapy was 66% among glaucoma patients and 59% of patients showed correct drop instillation technique. More progression was observed in patients with poor adherence and patients who did not instill drops correctly. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.37844/glauc.cat.2021.16.14
dc.identifier.endpage 88 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1305-9173
dc.identifier.issn 2717-7157
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 83 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 492835
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.37844/glauc.cat.2021.16.14
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/492835/adherence-to-drop-treatment-in-glaucoma-patients-and-its-relationship-with-progression
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/18802
dc.identifier.volume 16 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Glokom Katarakt en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Göz Hastalıkları en_US
dc.title Adherence To Drop Treatment in Glaucoma Patients and Its Relationship With Progression en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files