YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Pain Assessment Methods in Different Orthodontic Procedures

dc.contributor.author Cigerim, Saadet Cinarsoy
dc.contributor.author Erhamza, Turkan Sezen
dc.contributor.author Bayzed, Jamil
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:34:33Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:34:33Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Cigerim, Saadet Cinarsoy; Bayzed, Jamil] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Van, Turkiye; [Erhamza, Turkan Sezen] Kirikkale Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Kirikkale, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: This study compares two pain ratings that patients use to indicate how uncomfortable they are during bonding and the collection of orthodontic registration material. Methods: Two hundred people, ages eleven to twenty, participated in the study; 125 were female and 75 were male. The participants' discomfort levels were assessed during bonding operations and the initial registration material collection using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the facial pain scale (FPS). During the first registration material collection in oral photography, dental impressions, X-rays, bonding operations, lip retractor insertion, polishing, acid and sealing, and bracket application, pain levels were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the data between groups, while the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests were used to analyze the data within groups. The gathered data were statistically analyzed with a significance threshold of 5%. Results: There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the VAS and FPS scales when evaluating pain during intraoral photography, the dental impression procedure, X-rays, lip retractor insertion, polishing, acid and sealing, and bracket bonding (0.537< r < 0.734; P = 0.001). A statistically significant positive connection was also discovered when the gender difference was included (0.261 0.42; P= 0.001). Conclusion: Similar information was obtained during the orthodontic initial registration and bonding procedures using two different pain assessment instruments. It is also believed to make it possible to compare research using different pain scales. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.34172/johoe.2210.1509
dc.identifier.endpage 24 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2322-1372
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 19 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2210.1509
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/13823
dc.identifier.volume 13 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001247480800003
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Kerman Univ Medical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Vas en_US
dc.subject Fps en_US
dc.subject Pain en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Pain Assessment Methods in Different Orthodontic Procedures en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files