Effect of Using Calcium-Silicate and Silicone Based Root Canal Sealers in Bulk or With Main Core Material on Bond Strength
dc.authorscopusid | 57226737992 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57204283260 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 58167094700 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kadı, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Özlek, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Saed, Y. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T16:54:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-10T16:54:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.department-temp | Kadı G., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Altınbas University, İstanbul, Turkey; Özlek E., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Saed Y., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background. The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of calcium-silicate and silicone based root canal sealers in bulk and with main cone. Methods. Roots (n = 48) randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12) according to the obturation protocol; (1) iRoot SP in bulk; (2) iRoot SP with gutta-percha; (3) GuttaFlow Bioseal in bulk; (4) GuttaFlow Bioseal with gutta-percha. Six horizontal sections were obtained from each root (n = 72). Effect of sealers on bond strength was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Results. Highest mean value was obtained in iRoot-Bulk group and lowest in GuttaFlow Bioseal-GP group. Both iRoot SP groups had significantly higher bond strength values than both GuttaFlow Bioseal groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between iRoot-GP and iRoot-Bulk groups (P = 0.603) also GuttaFlow Bioseal-GP and GuttaFlow Bioseal-Bulk groups (P = 0.684). Conclusion. Based on findings, using calcium silicate-based sealer in bulk can be also suitable in clinical practice. © 2022 The Author(s). | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.34172/joddd.2022.036 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 233 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2008-210X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85151472341 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 229 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.036 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/2996 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Guttaflow Bioseal | en_US |
dc.subject | Iroot Sp | en_US |
dc.subject | Push-Out Bond Strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Root Canal Obturation | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of Using Calcium-Silicate and Silicone Based Root Canal Sealers in Bulk or With Main Core Material on Bond Strength | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |