YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Effect of Using Calcium-Silicate and Silicone Based Root Canal Sealers in Bulk or With Main Core Material on Bond Strength

dc.authorscopusid 57226737992
dc.authorscopusid 57204283260
dc.authorscopusid 58167094700
dc.contributor.author Kadı, G.
dc.contributor.author Özlek, E.
dc.contributor.author Saed, Y.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:54:02Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:54:02Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Kadı G., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Altınbas University, İstanbul, Turkey; Özlek E., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Saed Y., Department of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of calcium-silicate and silicone based root canal sealers in bulk and with main cone. Methods. Roots (n = 48) randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12) according to the obturation protocol; (1) iRoot SP in bulk; (2) iRoot SP with gutta-percha; (3) GuttaFlow Bioseal in bulk; (4) GuttaFlow Bioseal with gutta-percha. Six horizontal sections were obtained from each root (n = 72). Effect of sealers on bond strength was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Results. Highest mean value was obtained in iRoot-Bulk group and lowest in GuttaFlow Bioseal-GP group. Both iRoot SP groups had significantly higher bond strength values than both GuttaFlow Bioseal groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between iRoot-GP and iRoot-Bulk groups (P = 0.603) also GuttaFlow Bioseal-GP and GuttaFlow Bioseal-Bulk groups (P = 0.684). Conclusion. Based on findings, using calcium silicate-based sealer in bulk can be also suitable in clinical practice. © 2022 The Author(s). en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.34172/joddd.2022.036
dc.identifier.endpage 233 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2008-210X
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85151472341
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 229 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.036
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/2996
dc.identifier.volume 16 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Guttaflow Bioseal en_US
dc.subject Iroot Sp en_US
dc.subject Push-Out Bond Strength en_US
dc.subject Root Canal Obturation en_US
dc.title Effect of Using Calcium-Silicate and Silicone Based Root Canal Sealers in Bulk or With Main Core Material on Bond Strength en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files