YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Language Version of the Profile of Mood States (Poms)

dc.authorid Selvi, Yavuz/0000-0003-0218-6796
dc.authorwosid Aydin, Adem/Khy-0854-2024
dc.authorwosid Selvi, Yavuz/Glt-0029-2022
dc.contributor.author Selvi, Yavuz
dc.contributor.author Gulec, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Aydin, Adem
dc.contributor.author Besiroglu, Lutfullah
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:48:59Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:48:59Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Selvi, Yavuz; Aydin, Adem; Besiroglu, Lutfullah] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Van, Turkey; [Gulec, Mustafa] Ataturk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Erzurum, Turkey en_US
dc.description Selvi, Yavuz/0000-0003-0218-6796 en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: The POMS was developed to assess short-term mood changes and consisted of 65 adjectives and 6 subscales. The purpose of the study was to assess the translation adequacy of a Turkish version of the POMS, and to report the decision-making process of overcoming methodological faults. Method: The English version was translated to Turkish by expert team approach. Factor analysis for construct validation was predominantly used for assessment, in addition to other techniques: back translation, use of bilingual subjects, and correlation with other instruments for concurrent validation. Results: The final 58-item Turkish version has suitable psychometric properties. Our findings, based on data from Turkish participants, replicated the original 6-factor solution ("depression-dejection"-15, "tension-anxiety"-9, "anger-hostility"-12, "confusion-bewilderment"-7, "fatigue-inertia"-7, and "vigor-activity"-8). To achieve an acceptable fit, it was necessary to omit 7 items that did not fit any factor. We verified these results by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis on the validation sample and obtaining comparable fit and comparable factor loadings. The concurrent validity of this form was evidenced by the correlations between scores from the POMS subscales and scores from measures of anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Although the study shows valid psychometric properties, further studies made in various populations are needed to assess the sensitivity of the scale. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.5455/jmood.20110902072033
dc.identifier.endpage 161 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2146-1473
dc.identifier.issn 2146-2380
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 152 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20110902072033
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/1706
dc.identifier.volume 1 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000218921000002
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yerkure Tanitim & Yayincilik Hizmetleri A S en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Psychometric en_US
dc.subject Turkish en_US
dc.subject Profile en_US
dc.subject Mood en_US
dc.subject Validity en_US
dc.subject Reliability en_US
dc.title Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Language Version of the Profile of Mood States (Poms) en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files