Endovenous Laser Ablation (Evla) Versus High Ligation and Striping (hl/S): Two-Years Follow Up
| dc.contributor.author | Basela, H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydina, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aya, Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Inana, B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ekimb, H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goyac, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mehmet, B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T16:43:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-10T16:43:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is thought to minimize postoperative morbidity and reduce work loss compared with high ligation and stripping (HL/S). However, the procedures have not previously been compared in a trial with parallel groups where both treatments were performed in tumescent anesthesia on an out-patient basis. Patients with varicose veins due to GSV insufficiency were randomized to either EVLA (980 nm) or HL/S in tumescent anesthesia. Miniphlebectomies were also performed. In our clinics, 87 varicosis patients were treated between September 2006 and December 2009. EVLA was applied in 90 cases and HL/S was applied in 84 cases. Clinical features and demographic characteristics of the patients were summarized. EVLA procedure was done by 980 nm diode laser (Ceralas D 980, Biolitec) at continues mode with 15 W energy. Patient visits were done at post-operative 10th day, 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year. Routine physical examination and Doppler USG assessments were performed at these visits. EVLA and HL/S procedures were done in complete success in all cases at both groups. All cases were invited for control visits. At post-operative 10th day all patients were evaluated, at 1st year control visit number of attended patients was 130 (EVLA: 68, HL/S: 62) and at 2nd year control, visit number of attended patients was 104 (EVLA: 56, HL/S: 48). When complications developed after procedures were evaluated; no infection, hematoma or paresthesis were observed in EVLA group. However in HL/S group; infections, hematomas and paresthesis were observed in 2, 6 and 24 cases respectively. In terms of treatment success there was not significant difference between EVLA procedure and HL/S methods. However, in terms of post-op complication, EVLA method was associated with significantly less paresthesis, hematoma and pain. EVLA method is a method as effective and safe as standard treatment. However, when a long term result of this method is shown completely, its effectiveness will be cleared and its clinical utility will be established. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1301-0883 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84868101802 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/45 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Eastern Journal of Medicine | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Endovenous Laser Ablation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Great Saphenous Vein | en_US |
| dc.subject | High Ligation And Stripping | en_US |
| dc.title | Endovenous Laser Ablation (Evla) Versus High Ligation and Striping (hl/S): Two-Years Follow Up | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 59160341900 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55441445200 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55440393600 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55440897900 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55441149200 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55441344900 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55441344900 | |
| gdc.coar.access | metadata only access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.description.department | T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | Basela H., Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Aydina C., Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Aya Y., Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Inana B., Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Ekimb H., Yuzuncu Yil University, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Van, Turkey; Goyac C., Van Research and Training Hospital, Department of Radiodiagnostics, Van, Turkey; Mehmet B., Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 87 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 2 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q4 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 83 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 17 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | N/A | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus |
