Generative AI as the New Frontier in Science Education: A Systematic Review of Web of Science Articles

dc.authorscopusid 35757334700
dc.authorscopusid 57216977975
dc.authorscopusid 35603193700
dc.contributor.author Aydin-Gunbatar, Sevgi
dc.contributor.author Durukan, Alper
dc.contributor.author Gunbatar, Mustafa Serkan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-03T16:37:01Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-03T16:37:01Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Aydin-Gunbatar, Sevgi; Durukan, Alper] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Math & Sci Educ, TR-65100 Van, Turkiye; [Gunbatar, Mustafa Serkan] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, TR-65100 Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract This systematic review study investigated the research on the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in science education. The Web of Science database was screened by study titles and abstracts. In total, 41 peer-reviewed articles were included. The researchers created the coding scheme in light of GenAI use in education and science education literature. Results revealed that with 12 studies, most of the research was conducted in chemistry education. The highest frequency of the intended use was to evaluate GenAI tools' performance in tasks (e.g., solving physics problems), whereas very few studies aimed at enriching science teaching (n = 1). Regarding student-centeredness, only five studies let learners use the technology without any direction, whereas in seven studies, learners' use was guided. Concerning the level of use, in 14 studies, GenAI use was at a replacement level. The assessment was primarily focused on the instructional component in 23 papers. Most of the studies conducted with GenAI tools did not include participants (n = 20). Quantitative methods (n = 17) were preferred over qualitative ones (n = 10). Based on the results, the use of GenAI tools in science education seems to be in its infancy. At this stage, interdisciplinary partnerships between technology and science educators are necessary. In future research, science educators should focus more on using GenAI tools to enrich science instruction (e.g., how to enhance learners' arguments, how GenAI tool use affects learners' argument formation, and how GenAI tools can enrich the history and nature of science instruction). en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index - Arts & Humanities Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11191-025-00677-6
dc.identifier.issn 0926-7220
dc.identifier.issn 1573-1901
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105012907682
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00677-6
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/28317
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001547797800001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Science & Education en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Generative Artificial Intelligence en_US
dc.subject Science Education en_US
dc.subject Systematic Literature Review en_US
dc.subject ChatGPT en_US
dc.title Generative AI as the New Frontier in Science Education: A Systematic Review of Web of Science Articles en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files