Comparison of Remifentanil, Alfentanil, and Fentanil Co-Administered With Propofol To Facilitate Laryngeal Mask Insertion

dc.authorid Ozhan Caparlar, Ceyda/0000-0001-5306-1956
dc.authorscopusid 6506441981
dc.authorscopusid 6603124187
dc.authorscopusid 33267827800
dc.authorscopusid 34870233800
dc.authorscopusid 35249110700
dc.authorscopusid 7006207326
dc.authorwosid Özhan, Mehmet/Aba-4774-2020
dc.authorwosid Özhan Çaparlar, Ceyda/Abb-4555-2021
dc.authorwosid Orhan, Mehmet/A-7979-2018
dc.contributor.author Sizlan, Ali
dc.contributor.author Goktas, Ugur
dc.contributor.author Ozhan, Ceyda
dc.contributor.author Ozhan, Mehmet Ozguer
dc.contributor.author Orhan, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.author Kurt, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:49:15Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:49:15Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Sizlan, Ali; Ozhan, Mehmet Ozguer; Orhan, Mehmet Emin; Kurt, Ercan] Gulhane Mil Med Fac, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-06018 Ankara, Turkey; [Goktas, Ugur; Ozhan, Ceyda] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Ozhan Caparlar, Ceyda/0000-0001-5306-1956 en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: To compare the efficacy of different doses of fentanil, remifentanil, and alfentanil co-administered with propofol in patients undergoing minor surgery. Materials and methods: This double-blind, multi-centered, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 2 medical centers. One hundred forty-one ASA class I and II adult patients aged 18-65 years were included in the study. Patients received iv. 1 mu g kg(-1) fentanil (group F, n = 33), 10 mu g kg(-1) alfentanil (group A, n = 33), 0.5 mu g kg(-1) remifentanil (group R, n = 36), or saline (control group, n = 39) co-administered with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) without additives over 30 s. An LMA was inserted 90 s later. Conditions for the LMA insertion were assessed. The number of attempts, airway quality, and hemodynamic changes were recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in the demographic data among the groups. The LMA was more easily placed in the remifentanil group compared with the other groups. All first attempts for the LMA insertion were successful in the remifentanil group. When the opiates groups were compared with the control group, easier insertion rates were detected in all the opiate groups. LMA insertion was easiest in the remifentanil group, followed by the alfentanil, fentanil, and control groups, in that order. Heart rates and blood pressures were reduced in all groups, but no treatment was required. Conclusion: Opiates co-administered with propofol improved the LMA insertion conditions compared to propofol alone. Out of the opiates, remifentanil had the highest success rate. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/sag-0901-21
dc.identifier.endpage 70 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-76149100893
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 63 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-0901-21
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/1791
dc.identifier.volume 40 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000275833900010
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Remifentanil en_US
dc.subject Alfentanil en_US
dc.subject Fentanil en_US
dc.subject Propofol en_US
dc.subject Laryngeal Mask Airway en_US
dc.title Comparison of Remifentanil, Alfentanil, and Fentanil Co-Administered With Propofol To Facilitate Laryngeal Mask Insertion en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files