Why Students Do Not Prefer Online Learning: The Role of E-Learning Readiness and Community of Inquiry

dc.authorscopusid 57192921884
dc.authorscopusid 57211186456
dc.contributor.author Keskin, S.
dc.contributor.author Tat, O.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-30T16:06:11Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-30T16:06:11Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Keskin] Sinan, Department of Science Education, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Turkey; [Tat] Osman, Department of Science Education, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract This study examines at how e-learning readiness and the Community of Inquiry framework affect higher education students' preferences for various teaching delivery modes. In the study, Latent Class Analysis was used to profile the participants based on autonomous learning attributes, which is the pedagogical sub-dimension of e-learning readiness. As a result of this analysis, three classes were obtained as LC1 (high self-directed learning, low e-learning motivation), LC2 (high self-directed learning, medium-high e-learning motivation) and LC3 (medium level in all factors). When students' overall teaching mode preferences were analyzed using the Bradley-Terry model, a hierarchy of preferences was found, with blended learning, followed by face-to-face and finally online learning. Blended learning was widely preferred by LC2 and LC3, while LC1 showed an overwhelming preference for face-to-face. The inclusion of Community of Inquiry in the model made these differences in preferences even more pronounced. For LC1, face-to-face learning dominated preferences for social presence, while, remarkably, it showed an almost exclusive preference for teaching presence and cognitive presence. The findings highlight the importance of direct guidance and interaction in face-to-face settings, which may be more effective than the flexibility of online environments for certain learner profiles. Moreover, they may emphasize the necessity of varied instructional methods in higher education to meet the diverse demands of students. © 2025, Duzce University, Faculty of Education. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.33902/JPR.202537311
dc.identifier.endpage 19 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2602-3717
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105025127294
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202537311
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/29384
dc.identifier.volume 9 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Duzce University, Faculty of Education en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Pedagogical Research en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Blended Learning en_US
dc.subject Community of Inquiry en_US
dc.subject E-Learning Readiness en_US
dc.subject Mode of Teaching Delivery en_US
dc.subject Online Learning en_US
dc.title Why Students Do Not Prefer Online Learning: The Role of E-Learning Readiness and Community of Inquiry en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article

Files