Comparison of Focused and Unfocused Eswt in Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction
| dc.authorscopusid | 55695123600 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 57161983400 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 36929926100 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 15069311700 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 36524209300 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eryilmaz, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaplan, Ş. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aslan, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Demir, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taken, K. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T17:02:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-10T17:02:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | Eryilmaz R., Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Kaplan Ş., Department of Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Aslan R., Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Demir M., Department of Urology, Van Educational Research Hospital, Van, Turkey; Taken K., Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is more commonly used in noninvasive treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). There is no definitive treatment protocol on the use of ESWT. In this study, we aimed to compare focused and unfocused ESWT in ED. We created two groups, each including 20 patients with similar demographics. Focused ESWT is performed in one group, while unfocused ESWT is performed for the other group. Patients are assessed with IIEF-5 and EHS. Mean score of IIEF-5 was increased by 6.3 ± 3.3 (p <.05) from 9.6 ± 2.9 to 15.0 ± 5.0 in 3-month follow-up in the unfocused group. In the focused group, IIEF-5 score increased by 5.34 in average from 10.01 ± 2.5 to 15.4 ± 3.1. In conclusion, IIEF-5 score was significantly higher in the unfocused ESWT group than the focused ESWT group. © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13685538.2019.1610377 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 209 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1368-5538 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 31066334 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85065532213 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 206 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2019.1610377 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5501 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd. | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Aging Male | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Erectile Dysfunction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Focused Eswt | en_US |
| dc.subject | Li-Eswt | en_US |
| dc.subject | Unfocused Eswt | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of Focused and Unfocused Eswt in Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |