YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Imaging Techniques of Tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Grown With Different Organic and Conventional Fertilizer Applications

dc.authorscopusid 59663445600
dc.authorscopusid 13003332800
dc.contributor.author Kipcak Bitik, S.
dc.contributor.author Sensoy, S.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:54:44Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:54:44Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Kipcak Bitik S., Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Baskale Vocational School, Van, 65090, Turkey; Sensoy S., Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Agriculture, Horticulture Department, Van, 65090, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract In this study, which was carried out in field conditions in Van in 2019 and 2020, different image generation methods (biocrystallization method, and circular and rising picture chromatography methods) were used to determine the difference between various organic and conventional fertilizer applications. 3% frozen tomatoes and 16% CuCl2.2H2O were applied in the biocrystallization method, 80% frozen tomatoes and 1% silver nitrate solution were used in the circular chromatography method, and 100% frozen tomatoes and 0.5% silver nitrate and 0.5% iron sulfate solution were employed in the rising picture method. In light of the visual findings obtained at the end of the study, it has been determined that there are some differences between organic and conventional fertilizer applications. As the alteration between organic and conventional products; the center number difference in the copper crystallization method; the smoothness of the rings formed in the circular chromatogram and the vividness of the colors; in the rising painting method, it clearly reveals the transitions between colors and the difference in light and dark tones that occur in colors. © 2023, Centenary University. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi, YYU, (FDK-2019-8157); Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi, YYU en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.29133/yyutbd.1213160
dc.identifier.endpage 258 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1308-7576
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85164602903
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 248 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1186595
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1213160
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/3219
dc.identifier.volume 33 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Centenary University en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Conventional Fertilizer en_US
dc.subject Imaging Techniques en_US
dc.subject Organic Fertilizer en_US
dc.subject Tomato en_US
dc.title Imaging Techniques of Tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Grown With Different Organic and Conventional Fertilizer Applications en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files