YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Disaster Waste Management Process: the Case of February 6 Earthquake

dc.contributor.author Kasapoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.author Ercek, Yeliz Duygu
dc.contributor.author Aslan, Mustafa Taha
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:23:35Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:23:35Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Kasapoglu, Merve] Ataturk Univ, Architecture & Design Fac, Dept Architecture, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkiye; [Ercek, Yeliz Duygu] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Architecture & Design Fac, Dept Reg Planning, TR-65090 Van, Turkiye; [Aslan, Mustafa Taha] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Disaster wastes generated after earthquakes have a negative impact on the environment and living beings and cause damages that last for many years. Within the scope of the study, it is aimed to reveal the importance of the disaster waste management process. For this purpose, the disaster waste management process in the Kahramanmara & scedil; earthquake centered on February 6, which is the world's biggest disaster in 2023, was discussed. In this context, document/record and case study methods were used. In this context, "Waste Management Regulation", "Regulation on Regular Storage of Waste" and "Regulation on the Control of Excavation Soil, Construction and Demolition Waste" were examined. Also, The Landfill Directive, which concerns all member countries of the European Union and is included in the European Union Waste Legislation, was examined in order to compare it with the Turkish Legislation. The study was supported with data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). It was determined that there was no storage or sorting area for disaster waste in this region according to TSI data, the legislation examined did not contain sufficient and detailed information on the subject, and the reports published by the Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects (UCTEA) confirmed that the process was not managed properly in the region. It has been determined that the existing practices and legislation contradict each other, the legislation does not contain sufficient detail, the practices in the world have been investigated within the scope of the subject, and suggestions have been presented in this context. This study is important in terms of revealing the importance and correct positioning of waste storage and sorting areas in order to prevent similar situations in future earthquakes. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.31462/jcemi.2024.01034055
dc.identifier.endpage 55 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2630-5771
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 34 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1229852
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2024.01034055
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/10919
dc.identifier.volume 7 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001447014100003
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Golden Light Publ en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject February 6 Earthquake en_US
dc.subject Disaster Waste en_US
dc.subject Storage And Sorting Area en_US
dc.subject Waste Management Legislation en_US
dc.title Disaster Waste Management Process: the Case of February 6 Earthquake en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files