YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Protection of Intestinal Anastomoses in Septic Environment With Peritoneal Graft and Polyglycolic Acid Mesh: an Experimental Study

dc.authorid Dilek, Osman Nuri/0000-0002-6313-3818
dc.authorwosid Bakir/E-5842-2019
dc.authorwosid Dilek, Fatma Hüsniye/Hjy-8470-2023
dc.authorwosid Dilek, Osman Nuri/D-7711-2018
dc.contributor.author Dilek, ON
dc.contributor.author Bakir, B
dc.contributor.author Dilek, FH
dc.contributor.author Demirel, H
dc.contributor.author Yigit, MF
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:58:45Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:58:45Z
dc.date.issued 1996
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Yuzuncu Yil Univ,Sch Med,Dept Gen Surg,Van Yuzuncu,Turkey en_US
dc.description Dilek, Osman Nuri/0000-0002-6313-3818 en_US
dc.description.abstract We carried out an experimental study in dogs to evaluate the outcome of large bowel anastomosis with 6 stitches (Group C, n:6) in a septic environment with protection by a polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh (Group M, n:12) or peritoneal graft (Group P, n:12). Thirty dogs were used to compare the techniques. Two dogs in each group were re-operated after 3, 5, 7, 14, 28 and 90 days. They were evaluated for adhesion formation, lumen diameter (anastomotic index), clinical features, histologic appearance and quality of healing at the anastomotic sites. All dogs in group P and group M survived, whereas 2 dogs in the control group died of anastomotic leakage and 3 dogs were re-operated for anastomotic leakage and peritonitis. In group M, one dog was reoperated because of the anastomotic leakage and two dogs were reoperated because of the anastomotic stenosis. Also, 4 anastomoses showed evidence of moderate stenosis. In group P, three anastomoses were graded as minimal stenosis. Histopathologic evaluation showed more complete epithelization, less inflammation, and less adhesion in group P than group M. We could not find any study in the literature that described and compared both techniques. We report here the results of such a study. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage 265 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0001-5458
dc.identifier.issue 6 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 9008766
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 261 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4374
dc.identifier.volume 96 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:A1996WA68000005
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Assoc Soc Scientifique Med Belges en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Anastomosis, Surgical en_US
dc.subject Peritoneum en_US
dc.subject Dogs en_US
dc.subject Colon And Rectal Surgery en_US
dc.subject Polyglycolic Acid en_US
dc.title Protection of Intestinal Anastomoses in Septic Environment With Peritoneal Graft and Polyglycolic Acid Mesh: an Experimental Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files