YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Transradial Approach in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: a 2-Center Experience

dc.authorid Yurtdas, Mustafa/0000-0002-0516-9206
dc.authorwosid Gönüllü, Edip/Aav-7377-2021
dc.authorwosid Yurtdaş, Mustafa/X-7179-2019
dc.contributor.author Yurtdas, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Kaya, Yuksel
dc.contributor.author Gonullu, Edip
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:22:40Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:22:40Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Yurtdas, Mustafa] Van Reg Training & Res Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Van, Turkey; [Kaya, Yuksel] Kafkas Univ, Dept Cardiol, Fac Med, Kars, Turkey; [Gonullu, Edip] Van Reg Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Yurtdas, Mustafa/0000-0002-0516-9206 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background/aim: To document the safety, success, and complications of transradial coronary procedures. Materials and methods: This retrospective study consisted of 427 patients who had undergone transradial coronary angiography and/or angioplasty between June 2010 and May 2012. The main outcome measures were the procedural safety, success rate, and complications associated with transradial interventions. Results: Procedural success rate was 93.2% (398/427), with cannulation time of 2.1 +/- 1.4 min, diagnostic time of 5.6 +/- 2.1 min, fluoroscopy time of 9.5 +/- 6.6 min, and total procedure time of 47.1 +/- 20.2 min. The main causes for unsuccessful procedures were failed radial puncture (11 patients), serious radial artery spasm (12 patients), and distinct tortuosity (5 patients) and severe proximal stenosis (1 patient) of the right subclavian artery. Of 398 patients, 345 (86.7%) underwent both coronary angiography and angioplasty, while the remaining 53 (13.3%) had coronary angiography only. Major complication was recorded in only 1 patient (transient ischemic attack), whereas minor complications were observed in 76 patients (17 with symptomatic sinus bradycardia, 12 with venous thrombosis, 22 with hematoma, and 25 with radial artery occlusion). Conclusion: Our experience revealed that the transradial approach is a safe and feasible method for coronary procedures in patients with various manifestations of coronary disease. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/sag-1212-93
dc.identifier.endpage 673 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 25551940
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 666 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1212-93
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/10644
dc.identifier.volume 44 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000336959100023
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Radial Artery en_US
dc.subject Coronary Disease en_US
dc.subject Angiography en_US
dc.subject Angioplasty en_US
dc.title Transradial Approach in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: a 2-Center Experience en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files