A Study on Spawning Induction in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idellus Valenciennes, 1844) by Using Different Combinations of Lhrha ([d-Ser(but)6,pro9< and Domperidon
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2009
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kafkas Univ, veteriner Fakultesi dergisi
Abstract
In this study, the effects of single administration of [D-Ser(But)(6),Pro(9)-NEt]-LHRHa at high dose alone (50 mu g kg(-1)), and at different doses (10, 20 mu g kg-1) combined with constant dose of the dopamine receptor antagonist, Domperidon (10 mg kg(-1)), for induction of spawning in the grass carp broodstocks were determined under local hatchery conditions, and compared with classic Carp Pituitary Extract (CPE, double injection) application (Water temperature; 25 degrees C). Physiological salina (0.7% NaCl) injected fish were used as control group. No spawning was observed in the control group. Spawning ratio was low in LHRHa at high dose alone treatment group (50 mu g kg(-1)), and in 10 mu g kg(-1) dose of LHRHa at combined with 10 mg kg(-1) dose of DOM treatment group. Spawning ratio was high in 20 mu g kg(-1) dose of LHRHa combined with 10 mg kg(-1) dose of DOM treatment group, and in CPE treatment group. Latency period was shorter approximately two times in LHRHa+DOM treatment groups than CPE treatment groups (9-10 h, 17 h respectively). There was no differences between all spawning groups in respect of spawning index of broodstocks, and fertilisation rates of eggs (P>0.05). As a result, spawning was induced successfully in grass carp broodstocks by 20 mu g kg(-1) [D-Ser(But)(6),Pro(9)-NEt]-LHRHa+10 mg kg(-1) DOM treatment, in a single injection, in a shorter latency period and without decreasing in egg quality, comparing to CPE treatment. Application of this combination can be useful for healthy broodstock and hatchery management in grass carp culture.
Description
Keywords
Induction Of Spawning, Lhrha, Domperidon, Ctenopharyngodon Idellus
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3
Source
Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi
Volume
15
Issue
6
Start Page
897
End Page
902