YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

A Comparative Study on Urban and Rural Households Preferences of Fresh Mutton Meat Consumption (A Case Study in Eastern Region of Turkey-Heckman Model)

dc.authorid Sahin, Ahmet/0000-0003-4063-545X
dc.authorid Yildirim, Ibrahim/0000-0002-0883-8612
dc.authorscopusid 57212639629
dc.authorscopusid 35855687200
dc.authorscopusid 55898430700
dc.authorwosid Yildirim, Ibrahim/Aad-7482-2021
dc.contributor.author Sahin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Yildirim, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.author Deniz, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:45:37Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:45:37Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Sahin, Ahmet] Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Fac Agr, TR-46050 Kahramanmaras, Turkey; [Yildirim, Ibrahim] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Fac Agr, Van, Turkey; [Deniz, Ahmet] Baskale State Hosp, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Sahin, Ahmet/0000-0003-4063-545X; Yildirim, Ibrahim/0000-0002-0883-8612 en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to perform a comparative assessment of the urban and rural households' preferences of fresh mutton meat consumption in Hakkari, Turkey. Design/methodology/approach - The sample size consisted of 95 rural and 95 urban households. The data were collected from November 2007 until May 2008 intermittently. Probity and Heckman Models were used in the study. Findings - Price elasticity of mutton meat demand was calculated as -0.242, which reveals the mutton meat is a compulsory good in the research area. Income elasticity of mutton meat was found as 0.39, which shows relatively satisfactory amount of mutton meat is consumed. However, there existed great differences in terms of mutton meat consumption per capita among the income groups. Originality/value - The findings in the study may contribute to the mutton meat producers and marketers in the region when planning their production and marketing strategies. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/BFJ-06-2013-0161
dc.identifier.endpage 1908 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0007-070X
dc.identifier.issn 1758-4108
dc.identifier.issue 12 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84926340008
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 1897 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2013-0161
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/16406
dc.identifier.volume 116 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000348441200005
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Turkey en_US
dc.subject Consumption Structures en_US
dc.subject Heckman Method en_US
dc.subject Mutton Meat en_US
dc.title A Comparative Study on Urban and Rural Households Preferences of Fresh Mutton Meat Consumption (A Case Study in Eastern Region of Turkey-Heckman Model) en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files