YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Prevalence of Entamoeba Spp. in Stool Samples of Patients With Amebiasis Suspect by Native-Lugol and Elisa

dc.authorscopusid 25925735600
dc.authorscopusid 57214344822
dc.authorscopusid 6504565816
dc.contributor.author Beyhan, Y.E.
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, H.
dc.contributor.author Taş Cengiz, Z.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:00:48Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:00:48Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Beyhan Y.E., Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Parazitoloji Anabilim Dalı, Türkiye, Van, Turkey; Yılmaz H.; Taş Cengiz Z. en_US
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Entamoeba spp. in suspected stool samples submitted to our laboratory.; METHODS: In this retrospective study, stool samples of 998 patients with suspected amebiasis were sent from various clinics and services to our laboratory and were investigated by native-Lugol and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [for Entamoeba spp. antigen (Ridascreen® Entamoeba)] between January 2010 and December 2014.; RESULTS: By the end of the study, it was shown that 8.5% (85) of 997 patients, 7.45% (39) of males and 9.8% (46) of females whom amoeba antigen inspected in their stool samples, were positive. No parasite was identified by the saline-Lugol method. The highest antigen positivity was detected in the 25-44-year-old group with 11% positivity, and a high positivity of 23.2% was seen in March.; CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that amebiasis is still a major health concern for our region. Although no parasite was detected during microscopic examinations, the detection of antigen positivity by ELISA reveals that microscopic examinations require experience and utilizing only microscopic examinations may lead to overlooks. To obtain more reliable results in diagnosis, ELISA analyses that use E. histolytica-specific monoclonal antibodies should be applied in addition to microscopic methods. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5152/tpd.2016.4424
dc.identifier.endpage 62 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2146-3077
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 27594283
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85020364211
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 59 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5152/tpd.2016.4424
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4953
dc.identifier.volume 40 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Prevalence of Entamoeba Spp. in Stool Samples of Patients With Amebiasis Suspect by Native-Lugol and Elisa en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files