YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Investigation of Coxiella Burnetii and Ehrlichia Canis by Molecular Methods in Ticks Removed From Patients Admitted To Hospital With Tick Bite Complaints

dc.authorscopusid 55682206500
dc.authorscopusid 57224465562
dc.authorscopusid 57210965593
dc.authorscopusid 55623110300
dc.authorscopusid 57516565000
dc.contributor.author Ekici, A.
dc.contributor.author Gürbüz, E.
dc.contributor.author Halidi, A.G.
dc.contributor.author Ünlü, A.H.
dc.contributor.author Aydemir, S.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:02:39Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:02:39Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Ekici A., Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Van, Turkey; Gürbüz E., SBU Van Training and Research Hospital Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Van, Turkey; Halidi A.G., Muş Alparslan University, Bulanık Vocational School, Muş, Turkey; Ünlü A.H., Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Gevaş Vocational School, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Van, Turkey; Aydemir S., Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Ticks have to suck blood from their hosts during their developmental stages, except for the egg period. They also transmit the pathogens to their host while feeding. A total of 100 ticks obtained from 42 female and 58 male patients admitted to a hospital were included in the study. After the morphological examination of the ticks, DNA extraction was performed. Conventional PCR for Coxiella burnetii and Nested-PCR for Ehrlichia canis were performed using species-specific primers. In the morphological examination, it was determined that all of the ticks belonged to the Ixodidae family and 95 (95%) were Rhipicephalus sanguineus and 5 (5%) were Ixodes ricinus species. C. burnetii was detected in 36 ticks and E. canis was found in 26 ticks out of 100 ticks included in the study. It was determined that 33 (91.67%) of the C. burnetii infected ticks were R. sanguineus and 3 (8.33%) were I. ricinus. It was also determined that 25 (96.15%) of the E. canis infected ticks were R. sanguineus and one (3.85%) was the I. ricinus. When the incidence of C. burnetii and E. canis was examined according to the place of residence of the patients, it was found that C. burnetii was seen at a higher rate in people living in rural areas and as a result of the statistical analysis, it was found that the difference was statistically significant. In conclusion, ticks pose a significant risk as vectors of C. burnetii and E. canis. © 2021, ABADER (Adıyaman Bilimsel Arastırmalar Dernegi). All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.31594/commagene.1037939
dc.identifier.endpage 203 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2602-456X
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85152067380
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 199 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1110964
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.1037939
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5612
dc.identifier.volume 5 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher ABADER (Adıyaman Bilimsel Arastırmalar Dernegi) en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Commagene Journal of Biology en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Ixodidae en_US
dc.subject Pcr en_US
dc.subject Tick Contact en_US
dc.subject Zoonosis en_US
dc.title Investigation of Coxiella Burnetii and Ehrlichia Canis by Molecular Methods in Ticks Removed From Patients Admitted To Hospital With Tick Bite Complaints en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files