YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Effects of Subsidizing Forage Production on Animal Production in Van, Turkey

dc.authorid Yilmaz, Ibrahim/0000-0003-1503-4046
dc.authorscopusid 26028137900
dc.authorscopusid 7004914032
dc.authorwosid Yilmaz, Ibrahim/C-9578-2016
dc.contributor.author Sahin, Kasim
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Ibrahim Hakki
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:46:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:46:27Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Sahin, Kasim] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Econ, TR-65080 Zeve Kampus, Van, Turkey; [Yilmaz, Ibrahim Hakki] Igdir Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, Igdir, Turkey en_US
dc.description Yilmaz, Ibrahim/0000-0003-1503-4046 en_US
dc.description.abstract In last 5 years, government of Turkey (ministry of agriculture) is subsidizing forages cultivation, therefore forage cultivated area and forage production is increasing continuously in Van. That forage production is also affecting stock breeding positively. However, there is a lack of information on amount of forage production and increases on animal product in the region. The data belonged to 2007 production period and were collected from 441 forage producing farmers face to face by means of questionnaires. Forage production area in each farm was 2.51 ha, which were mainly alfalfa (2.09 ha), sanfoin (0.36 ha), vetch (0.01 ha) and silage corn (0.04 ha). Average cow number in each farm was 11.82 (5.28 dairy and 6.54 fattening cattles) and average sheep number was 46.66. Forages produced in each farm were used to feed animal in same farm. Produced forages just met 81.40% of requirement of farms. Concentrate feeds are provided from feed-milling companies. Forage production increased 2.21 folds within last 5 years. However, numbers of dairy cows and sheep increased only 23 and 18%, respectively. Even though there was a considerable amount of increase in forage production with subsidies, this increase was not seen in animal production. Thus, it can be said that subsidizing forage production did not adequately met the goal. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage 495 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1680-5593
dc.identifier.issn 1993-601X
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-67650488494
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 492 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/16699
dc.identifier.volume 8 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000263801600017
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Medwell online en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Animal And Forage Production en_US
dc.subject Subsidisy en_US
dc.subject Animal Farm en_US
dc.subject Cattles en_US
dc.subject Stock en_US
dc.title The Effects of Subsidizing Forage Production on Animal Production in Van, Turkey en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files