YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Light Transmission of Different Resin Composites at Different Thicknesses

dc.authorscopusid 55221797200
dc.authorscopusid 57193706287
dc.authorscopusid 57125744400
dc.authorscopusid 57193709604
dc.contributor.author Saridağ, S.
dc.contributor.author Çökük, N.
dc.contributor.author Kara, E.
dc.contributor.author Köseler, E.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:00:56Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:00:56Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Saridağ S., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey; Çökük N., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey; Kara E., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey; Köseler E., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the light transmission of different types and thicknesses of composites. Materials and Methods: Disk-shaped (N = 240, n = 10 per group) samples of ten direct composites (Aelite-Aesthetic -Enamel, Aelite-LS-Posterior, Aelite-All-Purpose-Body, Clearfil-Majesty-ES-2 Classic, Filtek Ultimate-Enamel, Filtek Z-250 Universal, G-ænial Anterior, Gradia Direct, IPS Empress Direct, and Tetric N-Ceram) and two indirect composites (Estenia C & B and Signum-Ceramis) with diameters of 10 mm and thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm were fabricated. The translucency of each sample was determined with a digital radiometer using the direct transmission method and a 1200 mW/cm2 LED beam as the light source. Measurements were repeated three times for each specimen, and the obtained data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan multiple range tests (α = 0.05). Results: The materials with the highest light transmission values included the Filtek Ultimate-Enamel (1 mm: 8.36 lux, 2 mm: 4.62 lux), Gradia Direct (1 mm: 8.57 lux, 2 mm: 4.65 lux), and Tetric N-Ceram, while those with the lowest light transmission values included the Aelite-All-Purpose-Body (1 mm: 2.89 lux, 2 mm: 1.21 lux) and Estenia C & B composites. Conclusions: The type of composite, as well as the particle size and filler content, significantly affected the light transmission characteristics. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.7126/cumudj.298879
dc.identifier.endpage 204 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85016075945
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 197 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 271269
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.298879
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5001
dc.identifier.volume 19 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Cumhuriyet Dental Journal en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Composite en_US
dc.subject Filler en_US
dc.subject Indirect Composites en_US
dc.subject Light Transmission en_US
dc.subject Radiometer en_US
dc.title Light Transmission of Different Resin Composites at Different Thicknesses en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files