Light Transmission of Different Resin Composites at Different Thicknesses
dc.authorscopusid | 55221797200 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57193706287 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57125744400 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57193709604 | |
dc.contributor.author | Saridağ, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Çökük, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kara, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Köseler, E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-10T17:00:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-10T17:00:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.department | T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.department-temp | Saridağ S., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey; Çökük N., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey; Kara E., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey; Köseler E., Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the light transmission of different types and thicknesses of composites. Materials and Methods: Disk-shaped (N = 240, n = 10 per group) samples of ten direct composites (Aelite-Aesthetic -Enamel, Aelite-LS-Posterior, Aelite-All-Purpose-Body, Clearfil-Majesty-ES-2 Classic, Filtek Ultimate-Enamel, Filtek Z-250 Universal, G-ænial Anterior, Gradia Direct, IPS Empress Direct, and Tetric N-Ceram) and two indirect composites (Estenia C & B and Signum-Ceramis) with diameters of 10 mm and thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm were fabricated. The translucency of each sample was determined with a digital radiometer using the direct transmission method and a 1200 mW/cm2 LED beam as the light source. Measurements were repeated three times for each specimen, and the obtained data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan multiple range tests (α = 0.05). Results: The materials with the highest light transmission values included the Filtek Ultimate-Enamel (1 mm: 8.36 lux, 2 mm: 4.62 lux), Gradia Direct (1 mm: 8.57 lux, 2 mm: 4.65 lux), and Tetric N-Ceram, while those with the lowest light transmission values included the Aelite-All-Purpose-Body (1 mm: 2.89 lux, 2 mm: 1.21 lux) and Estenia C & B composites. Conclusions: The type of composite, as well as the particle size and filler content, significantly affected the light transmission characteristics. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7126/cumudj.298879 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 204 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-2852 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85016075945 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 197 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 271269 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.298879 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5001 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Composite | en_US |
dc.subject | Filler | en_US |
dc.subject | Indirect Composites | en_US |
dc.subject | Light Transmission | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiometer | en_US |
dc.title | Light Transmission of Different Resin Composites at Different Thicknesses | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |