YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

How Does Stock Market Volatility Affect Business Cycles? Asymmetric Evidence From Türkiye

dc.authorwosid Karagöl, Veysel/Iaq-9934-2023
dc.contributor.author Karagol, Veysel
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:45:54Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:45:54Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Karagol, Veysel] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Ercis Isletme Fak, Iktisat Bolumu, Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract This study aims to investigate how stock market volatility affects business cycles in Turkey for the quarterly period 1998-2022. Borsa Istanbul 100 index return series (RBIST) and detrended real Gross Domestic Product (BC) are employed to proxy stock market volatility and business cycles, respectively. Asymmetric methods are used to decompose the effects of this volatility in the expansion and contraction phases of business cycles. First, business cycles are examined under the expansion and contraction regimes by the Markov regime-switching GARCH (MS-GARCH) method. According to the findings of the MS-GARCH method, RBIST negatively affects BC in both phases. However, this effect is relatively greater during contraction phases such as the Banking Crisis in the early 2000s, the Global Financial Crisis, the 2016 and 2018 Currency Crises, and the recent Covid-19 Pandemic. Second, the non-linear ARDL (NARDL) method is applied to robust the findings. The findings of the NARDL method in the short run corroborate the findings obtained from the MSGARCH method. The positive and negative components of RBIST have a negative effect on BC in the short run, but it is positive and symmetric in the long run. Overall, the findings of the study suggest that policymakers should consider the non-linear characteristics of the relationship between stock market volatility and business cycles. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.30784/epfad.1303396
dc.identifier.endpage 481 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2587-151X
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 467 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1199562
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1303396
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/989
dc.identifier.volume 8 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001343112600005
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.institutionauthor Karagol, Veysel
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher Economic and Financial Research Assoc - Efad en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Stock Market en_US
dc.subject Volatility en_US
dc.subject Business en_US
dc.subject Cycles en_US
dc.subject Ms-Garch en_US
dc.subject Nardl en_US
dc.subject Turkiye en_US
dc.title How Does Stock Market Volatility Affect Business Cycles? Asymmetric Evidence From Türkiye en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files