YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Insertion of Buccally Tilted and Placed Implants in Edentulous Atrophic Posterior Mandibular Sites

dc.authorid Kaplan, Volkan/0000-0002-7605-1125
dc.authorscopusid 24169360200
dc.authorscopusid 6602789050
dc.authorscopusid 55318687000
dc.authorscopusid 56789733600
dc.authorwosid Kaplan, Volkan/Aba-6258-2020
dc.contributor.author Ozkan, Birkan Taha
dc.contributor.author Eskitascioglu, Gurcan
dc.contributor.author Cigerim, Levent
dc.contributor.author Kaplan, Volkan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:48:29Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:48:29Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Ozkan, Birkan Taha; Eskitascioglu, Gurcan; Cigerim, Levent; Kaplan, Volkan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Dent, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Kaplan, Volkan/0000-0002-7605-1125 en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper presents our new methodology and evaluates the feasibility of buccally tilted and placed implant combined with standard abutment placement in patients with insufficient bone height through implant software programme. Forty patients with 62 mandibular sites were measured in computed tomography (CT) imaging. The Buccally tilted and placed implants combined with standard abutment simulation were administered in implant software programme. The different parameters were measured in CT The localization of inferior alveolar nerve and implant, inclination degree of implant, transversal and vertical thickness of local distances etc. were evaluated in order to eliminate the nerve injury with providing interocclusal relationship. The buccal distance at the mandibular canal level was higher than the lingual distance in posterior mandible at lower first molar region. The mean inclination degree of the implant fixtures were 17.85 +/- 8.01. The mean measurement of the acquired length of implant during implant placement simulation was 11.06 +/- 1.73. The mean distance of the vertical gain was 3.81 +/- 1.84. The hypothesis of buccally positioned and tilted implant placement instead of advanced surgical procedures would be preferable in atrophic posterior mandibula. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0029
dc.identifier.endpage 3166 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1310-2818
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84865526901
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 3163 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0029
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/1562
dc.identifier.volume 26 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000307803600017
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Diagnosis Press Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Atrophic Mandibular Posterior Region en_US
dc.subject Buccaly Tilted Implant en_US
dc.subject Computerized Tomography en_US
dc.title Insertion of Buccally Tilted and Placed Implants in Edentulous Atrophic Posterior Mandibular Sites en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files