YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Why Rc Buildings Failed in the 2011 Van, Turkey, Earthquakes: Construction Versus Design Practices

dc.authorscopusid 36720357400
dc.authorwosid Erdil, Baris/Lxv-9472-2024
dc.contributor.author Erdil, Baris
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:28:04Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:28:04Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Erdil, Baris] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-65000 Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The 2011 Van earthquakes revealed that although earthquake-resistant codes were revised after significant research and after each major earthquake, construction quality had a little progress in the region. A total of 63 RC residential buildings that collapsed or were severely damaged in 2011 Van earthquakes were investigated in detail. It was found that there is an increasing trend in terms of number of stories in Ercis, Turkey. However, not only the taller buildings experienced more damage but also the shorter ones were damaged or collapsed. Column ratio has a decreasing trend but shear wall ratio increases with time. As for the ratio of the total vertical elements to the total floor area, it has a slight decrease with time. Although some design projects provide lower reinforcements, after 1995, the reinforcement ratio was either close to 1% or greater. Reinforcement ratio at the site was found to be lower than the ones specified in the design projects. Most of the buildings had shear walls but they were mostly oriented in the weak axis of the building and the as-built shear capacity of the buildings was found to be 50-60% of their design shear capacity. Concrete compressive strength was approximately 8 MPa. Some buildings were vulnerable even under gravity loading. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000980
dc.identifier.issn 0887-3828
dc.identifier.issn 1943-5509
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85017586433
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000980
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11938
dc.identifier.volume 31 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000399654700015
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.institutionauthor Erdil, Baris
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Asce-amer Soc Civil Engineers en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Van Earthquake Of 2011 en_US
dc.subject Building Failures en_US
dc.subject Damage Assessment en_US
dc.subject Column Ratio en_US
dc.subject Shear Wall Ratio en_US
dc.title Why Rc Buildings Failed in the 2011 Van, Turkey, Earthquakes: Construction Versus Design Practices en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files