YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Effects of Alum Treatment of Two Litter Materials on Growth Performance of Broiler Chicken

dc.authorscopusid 25122107500
dc.authorscopusid 57210649902
dc.contributor.author Alkis, Emine
dc.contributor.author Celen, Mehmet Fatih
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:46:23Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:46:23Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Alkis, Emine; Celen, Mehmet Fatih] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, TR-65080 Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of aluminum sulfate (alum) amendment to 2 litter materials on broiler growth performances. 645 newly born broiler chicks were randomly allocated into 4 litter groups (control straw, control sawdust, alum treated straw and alum treated sawdust). Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the 42 day experimental period. Chicks were placed in floor pens at a final stocking density of 12 bird/m(2). At the end of the experiment, live weights of control straw, control sawdust, alum treated straw and alum treated sawdust groups in females were 2173.46, 2183.43, 2365.74, 2383.27 g respectively and in males were 2566.69, 2503.43, 2578.68, 2675.46 g respectively. Alum provided benefits broiler weight gain when compared to the untreated control. FCR of control straw, control sawdust, alum treated straw and alum treated sawdust groups were 1.76, 1.72, 1.86 and 1.77 respectively. Livability of control straw, control sawdust, alum treated straw and alum treated sawdust groups in females were 88.59, 90.55, 83.97 and 88.13% respectively and in males 91.73, 96.51, 90.64 and 90.79% respectively. Livability (%) was not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. The weight of breast (g), neck (g), gizzard (g), heart (g), back (g) and fat (g) did not differ among groups. There were significantly different in live weight and weight of carcass (g) among groups. Thigh (g), wing (g), liver (g) were significantly different among groups and sexes (P < 0.05). en_US
dc.description.sponsorship scientific research funding centre of Yuzuncu Yil University [2006FBE-YL41] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was financed by the scientific research funding centre of Yuzuncu Yil University. Project number: 2006FBE-YL41. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage 521 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1991-637X
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-78650314306
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 518 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/16679
dc.identifier.volume 4 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000268812800014
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Academic Journals en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Litter en_US
dc.subject Aluminum Sulfate en_US
dc.subject Broiler en_US
dc.subject Performances en_US
dc.title Effects of Alum Treatment of Two Litter Materials on Growth Performance of Broiler Chicken en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files