YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion

dc.authorscopusid 56790115100
dc.authorscopusid 57190575188
dc.authorscopusid 36020260100
dc.authorscopusid 51764330800
dc.authorscopusid 56344198500
dc.contributor.author Sen, O.G.
dc.contributor.author Bilgin, B.
dc.contributor.author Koçak, S.
dc.contributor.author Sağlam, B.C.
dc.contributor.author Koçak, M.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:01:22Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:01:22Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Sen O.G., Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Bilgin B., Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey; Koçak S., Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey; Sağlam B.C., Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey; Koçak M.M., Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The aim of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next (PTN), Twisted File (TF) Adaptive, and Reciproc instruments. Forty-five extracted human maxillary canines were selected and randomly assigned into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared using PTN instruments with continuous rotation (n=15), TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion (n=15), Reciproc instruments with reciprocating motion (n=15). During the preparations, canals were irrigated using distilled water and material extruded apically was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. After a 5-day drying period in an incubator, the tubes were weighed and the dry weight of the extruded debris was calculated. Data distributions were assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test, and groups were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. The greatest amount of debris extruded by TF Adaptive and the least by PTN, but the difference was insignificant between groups (p=0.259). All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion. © 2018, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1590/0103-6440201801967
dc.identifier.endpage 248 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0103-6440
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 29972449
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85049443436
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 245 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801967
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5130
dc.identifier.volume 29 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Brazilian Dental Journal en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Apical Extrusion en_US
dc.subject Canal Preparation en_US
dc.subject Motion Kinematics en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files