YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Effect of Cachexia on Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With Best Supportive Care

dc.authorscopusid 57215867549
dc.authorscopusid 56644431400
dc.contributor.author Sakin, A.
dc.contributor.author Aldemir, M.N.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:02:29Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:02:29Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Sakin A., University of Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Van Training and Research hospital, Van, Turkey; Aldemir M.N., Department of Medical Oncology, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cachexia on survival in metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients treated with best supportive care (BSC) using real-life data. From 2015 to 2019, metastatic GC patients who were treated with BSC were included in this study. The study enrolled 53 metastatic GC patients, 36 (67.9%) were male and 17 (32.1%) were female. The median age of the patients was 66 years. The patients were assigned into two groups, according to body mass index (BMI): BMI <18kg/m2 or BMI ≥18 kg/m2 . A total of 18 patients (33.9%) were in the BMI <18kg/m2 group and 35 patients (66.1%) were in the BMI ≥18 kg/m2 group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two BMI groups with a median overall survival (mOS) of 1 month in the BMI <18kg/m2 group and 3 months in the BMI ≥18 kg/m2 group (p<0.001). In the multivariate analyses, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97), chronic obstructive pulmonary (HR, 6.53), BMI <18kg/m2 (HR, 2.31), liver metastasis (HR, 3.53), and peritoneum metastasis (HR, 2.31) were associated with OS. In this study, we found that presence of cachexia at the time of diagnosis in metastatic GC patients treated with BSC was associated with shorter survival in comparison to non-cachectic patients. © 2020, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/ejm.2020.44365
dc.identifier.endpage 529 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0883
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85091357458
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 524 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 411904
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2020.44365
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5549
dc.identifier.volume 25 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eastern Journal of Medicine en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Best Supportive Care en_US
dc.subject Body Mass Index en_US
dc.subject Cachexia en_US
dc.subject Gastric Cancer en_US
dc.title The Effect of Cachexia on Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With Best Supportive Care en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files