YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Effect of Whitening Mouthwashes on Hybrid Ceramic With Different Surface Treatments

dc.authorscopusid 57218145351
dc.authorscopusid 57222106520
dc.contributor.author Özarslan, M.
dc.contributor.author Can, D.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:54:14Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:54:14Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Özarslan M., Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey; Can D.B., Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of t hree whitening mouthwashes with various contents on hybrid ceramics with three different surface treatments in terms of color change. Samples of 7x5x1 mm dimensions were prepared from hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic-VE). The surfaces of the samples were standardized with silicon carbide papers. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups (Group C: no additional polishing, Group L: VE technical kit and Group G: glaze was applied) (n=24). All samples were kept in coffee for seven days after the initial colors were recorded. Following the second color measurement (ΔE001), each group was divided into 3 subgroups and kept in whitening mouthwashes with differ ent contents (Containing hydrogen peroxide, non-hydrogen peroxide and activated carbon) for 24 hours (n=8). The final color measurement was measured (ΔE002). Color changes were evaluated according to CIEDE2000. Shapiro-Wilk, One way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis of the data (p˂0.05). There was a significant difference in all groups for ΔE001, with the highest in Group C (Group L and Group G, respectively). The mouthwashes showed similar color changes on VE with different surface treatments (p≥ 0.05). Group C showed a significantly higher ΔE002 value than Group G in containing hydrogen peroxide mouthwash. Clinically acceptable color changes were observed in groups G and L after kept in coffee. After immersion in whitening mouthwash, all groups showed values below the threshold of perceptibility and acceptability (50:50% acceptability ΔE= 1.8, perceptibility ΔE=0.8). © 2022, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/ejm.2022.82653
dc.identifier.endpage 572 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0883
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85140008561
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 566 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1175698
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2022.82653
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/3061
dc.identifier.volume 27 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eastern Journal of Medicine en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Color Change en_US
dc.subject Hybrid Ceramic en_US
dc.subject Surface Treatments en_US
dc.subject Whitening Mouthwash en_US
dc.title Effect of Whitening Mouthwashes on Hybrid Ceramic With Different Surface Treatments en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files