YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Reducing Gray, Blue, Green, and Total Water Footprint in Wastewater Irrigated Silage Maize in Zero Tillage

dc.authorid Sahin, Ustun/0000-0002-1924-1715
dc.authorscopusid 57211536598
dc.authorscopusid 7005892189
dc.authorwosid Yerli, Caner/Gse-5620-2022
dc.authorwosid Åžahä°N, Üstãœn/Aad-9266-2019
dc.contributor.author Yerli, Caner
dc.contributor.author Sahin, Ustun
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:24:06Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:24:06Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Yerli, Caner] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Van, Turkiye; [Sahin, Ustun] Ataturk Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Struct & Irrigat, Erzurum, Turkiye en_US
dc.description Sahin, Ustun/0000-0002-1924-1715 en_US
dc.description.abstract No study has been found examining the contribution of gray water footprint input per unit yield to reducing blue and green water footprint output in silage maize irrigated with different levels of wastewater under different tillage practices. Therefore, this 2-year silage maize field study examined the effect of three different levels of recycled wastewater (100, 67, and 33% of irrigation need in W100, W67, and W33) and 100% irrigation with freshwater on water footprint under conventional and zero tillage. Under zero tillage, W100 had the lowest blue, green, and total water footprint per unit yield of 2.8, 6.1, and 47 m(3) ton(-1) for fresh biomass, respectively, and 9.2, 20.1, and 155.3 m(3) ton(-1) for dry biomass. Among the wastewater treatments, the W33 resulted in the highest water footprints per unit yield under conventional tillage. Blue, green, gray, and total water footprints per unit fresh yield under zero tillage were 9.8, 5.9, 13.1, and 10.3% lower than conventional tillage, while the values for dry biomass were 15, 14.3, 18.6, and 16.6% lower. In conclusion, W100 under zero tillage can be an effective way to protect freshwater resources by reducing blue, green, and total water footprint outputs with less gray water footprint input per unit yield. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) [119O528] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The study was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) with project number 119O528. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.2166/wcc.2024.278
dc.identifier.endpage 5792 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2040-2244
dc.identifier.issn 2408-9354
dc.identifier.issue 12 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85215007529
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 5778 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.278
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11101
dc.identifier.volume 15 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001376665800001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Iwa Publishing en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Blue Water en_US
dc.subject Gray Water en_US
dc.subject Green Water en_US
dc.subject Silage Maize en_US
dc.subject Tillage-Sowing en_US
dc.subject Water Footprint en_US
dc.title Reducing Gray, Blue, Green, and Total Water Footprint in Wastewater Irrigated Silage Maize in Zero Tillage en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files