YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Interactions Between the Science Teaching Orientations and Components of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of In-Service Chemistry Teachers

dc.authorid Ekiz-Kiran, Betul/0000-0002-0988-8507
dc.authorscopusid 57214092221
dc.authorscopusid 14821798100
dc.authorwosid Ekiz-Kiran, Betul/Jac-4723-2023
dc.authorwosid Ekiz-Kiran, Betul/V-9814-2017
dc.contributor.author Ekiz-Kiran, Betul
dc.contributor.author Boz, Yezdan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:34:20Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:34:20Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Ekiz-Kiran, Betul] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Maths & Sci Edu, Van, Turkey; [Boz, Yezdan] Middle East Tech Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Maths & Sci Edu, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description Ekiz-Kiran, Betul/0000-0002-0988-8507 en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the interactions between in-service chemistry teachers' science teaching orientations and other components of their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Two experienced chemistry teachers participated in this study. Data were collected through interviews, classroom observations, and field notes as the participants taught the mixtures unit. The results indicated that the participants held solid foundation purposes, in which students use science to be successful in their exams or next classes, along with everyday coping and correct explanations purposes. When participants' correct explanations and solid foundation purposes interacted together with the same PCK component, solid foundation appeared to be the reason for their correct explanations purpose. The teaching strategies that teachers preferred to use interacted with their solid foundation and correct explanations purposes, and the participants altered curricula only if they believed it would lead students to achieve better scores on examinations. Participants' beliefs about science teaching and learning indicated aspects of teacher-focused beliefs that prevent teachers from focusing on students' prerequisite knowledge, learning difficulties, and misconceptions. These beliefs interacted with all the sub-components of knowledge of instructional strategies. In addition, there was an interaction between knowledge of curricula and beliefs about science teaching and learning for participants that were more knowledgeable about the curriculum. Moreover, what the teachers assessed was related to their correct explanations and everyday coping beliefs, while the way they assessed was related to their solid foundation beliefs. Last, none of the participants emphasised the aspects of the nature of science during their instruction. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.1039/c9rp00092e
dc.identifier.endpage 112 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1109-4028
dc.identifier.issn 1756-1108
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85078205314
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 95 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00092e
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/13776
dc.identifier.volume 21 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000508882600008
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Royal Soc Chemistry en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.title Interactions Between the Science Teaching Orientations and Components of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of In-Service Chemistry Teachers en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files