YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Can the Urine Dipstick Test Be Used as a Proteinuria Screening Test

dc.authorscopusid 59130170300
dc.authorscopusid 56389653700
dc.authorscopusid 57215935418
dc.contributor.author Batur, T.
dc.contributor.author Çokluk, E.
dc.contributor.author Akbay, H.İ.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:55:18Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:55:18Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Batur T., Department of Biochemistry, Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey; Çokluk E., Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey; Akbay H.İ., Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the chemical dipstick protein measurement method, which can be used for screening purposes, in the detection of proteinuria. The results from 795 individuals were retrospectively scanned. In order to evaluate the urine dipstick’s accuracy in detecting proteinuria, the current study accepted protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) as the reference value, and three different criteria were used according to different age groups [PCR: ≥ 0.2 g/g (>2 years), ≥ 0.5 g/g (6 months-2 years), and ≥ 0.8 g/g (0-6 months)]. While evaluating diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, two cut-off values [trace and 1(+)] were evaluated. Area under the curve (AUC) by Receiver operating characteristic analysis were analyzed. The calculated sensitivity levels were lower than 70% for all age groups, with an AUC of 0.680, 0.780, and 0.768 for the age groups of 0–6 months, 6 months–2 years, and > 2 years, respectively. When the PCR was taken as a reference for proteinuria, the chemical dipstick test only proved suitable for screening proteinuria in the >6 months age group. Nonetheless, its performance could benefit from further improvement. Although the use of dipsticks is fast, simple, and inexpensive, this research indicates that they cannot replace PCR and 24-hour urine protein amount tests in the diagnosis and follow-up of renal diseases, which are generally known to be asymptomatic until their progression and complications are detected. © 2024, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/ejm.2024.34445
dc.identifier.endpage 185 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0883
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85193244502
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 181 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1244079
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2024.34445
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/3445
dc.identifier.volume 29 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eastern Journal of Medicine en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Protein/Creatinine Ratio en_US
dc.subject Proteinuria en_US
dc.subject Tetrabromophenol Blue Dye Method en_US
dc.subject Urine Dipstick en_US
dc.title Can the Urine Dipstick Test Be Used as a Proteinuria Screening Test en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files