Effect of Different Mechanical Cleansing Protocols of Dentin for Recementation Procedures on Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Conventional and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements

dc.contributor.author Bavbek, A. B.
dc.contributor.author Goktas, B.
dc.contributor.author Sahinbas, A.
dc.contributor.author Ozcopur, B.
dc.contributor.author Eskitascioglu, G.
dc.contributor.author Ozcan, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:44:43Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:44:43Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.description Sahinbas, Abdurrahman/0000-0002-7916-0132; Ozcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098 en_US
dc.description.abstract Service life of debonded indirect dental restorations could be prolonged by recementation. This process requires removal of cement remnants from dentin. This study evaluated the effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength (mu SBS) of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements. The labial surfaces mandibular incisors (N=200) were ground with a low speed saw to expose the corona] dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into two subgroups (n: 100 per group) and received either (a) conventional (Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray, PAN) or (b) self-adhesive (Clearfil SA, Kuraray, CSA) resin cement. Resin cements were condensed into polyethylene molds incrementally and photo polymerized using an LED polymerization unit. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and subjected to mu SBS (0.5 mm/min). Resin cement remnants on bonded dentin surfaces were removed using by (a) composite finishing bur (cb), (b) tungsten carbide bur (ob), (c) ultrasonic scaler tip (sc) or (d) pumice-water slurry (pw). Non-cleaned teeth acted as the control group (cn) (n: 20 per subgroup). After cleaning, the same cement type was rebonded simulating clinical recementation. Failure types were analyzed using optical microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks, Mann-Whitney U and Bonferroni tests (alpha=0.05). Overall, CSA (6.42 +/- 2.96) showed significantly lower results than that of PAN cement (7.88 +/- 3.49) (p < 0.05). All cleansing protocols (4.29 +/- 2.17 to 5.82 +/- 2.5) showed significantly lower results than that of the control group (9.84 +/- 4.88) for PAN cement. For CSA cement, all cleansing protocols presented non-significant results (4.25 +/- 2.74 to 6.44 +/- 2.4 MPa) compared to control group (p > 0.05) expect cb method (3.42 +/- 1.47) (p < 0.05). Remnants of cements were detected on dentin surfaces in all groups at varying degrees. SEM showed that while using pumice-water slurry was the least effective for PAN, tungsten carbide bur was the most effective for both cements. All other methods showed similar cleansing efficacy. None of the cleansing protocols yielded to complete removal of resin cement rest on dentin upon recementation for both cements tested. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.012
dc.identifier.issn 0143-7496
dc.identifier.issn 1879-0127
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84869212094
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.012
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/16140
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Adhesion en_US
dc.subject Bond Strength en_US
dc.subject Cementation en_US
dc.subject Cleansing en_US
dc.subject Resin Cement en_US
dc.subject Self-Adhesive Cement en_US
dc.title Effect of Different Mechanical Cleansing Protocols of Dentin for Recementation Procedures on Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Conventional and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Sahinbas, Abdurrahman/0000-0002-7916-0132
gdc.author.id Ozcan, Mutlu/0000-0002-9623-6098
gdc.author.scopusid 30067541100
gdc.author.scopusid 57189625937
gdc.author.scopusid 55486849500
gdc.author.scopusid 55542127400
gdc.author.scopusid 6602789050
gdc.author.scopusid 7102067681
gdc.author.wosid Şahinbaş, Abdurrahman/Aar-8000-2020
gdc.author.wosid Özcan, Mutlu/B-2862-2013
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Bavbek, A. B.; Goktas, B.; Sahinbas, A.; Eskitascioglu, G.] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-65080 Van, Turkey; [Ozcopur, B.] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, TR-65080 Van, Turkey; [Ozcan, M.] Univ Zurich, Dent Mat Unit, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland en_US
gdc.description.endpage 112 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 107 en_US
gdc.description.volume 41 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000315547600013
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus

Files