Evaluation of Clinical Response according to Category and Level of Evidence for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Indications: A Single-Center Experience

dc.authorscopusid 24472686400
dc.authorscopusid 60105584800
dc.contributor.author Dogan, Ali
dc.contributor.author Aydeniz, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-30T15:27:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-10-30T15:27:00Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Dogan, Ali; Aydeniz, Gokhan] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Hematol Dept, Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The present study investigates the indications of patients who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) based on the category and level of evidence outlined in the 2023 guidelines of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) and evaluates their treatment responses. Methodology: This retrospective study, the records of patients who underwent TPE at Van Yuzuncu Y & imath;l University Medical Faculty Hospital between January 2020 to December 2024 were reviewed, including their demographic characteristics, indications, plasmapheresis procedure data and complications. The indications were classified according to the categories, levels of evidence and treatment responses laid out in the ASFA 2023 guidelines. Results: A total of 234 adult patients were included in the study, of whom 56.4% were female. Hematological (41.9%) and neurological (38.5%) disorders accounted for the majority of the conditions treated with TPE. Of the total, 53% of the patients were classified as Category-I, while the total proportion of patients with Grade-IA, IB and IC evidence levels was 64.5%. The complete response rate was 35.5% in Category-I patients, the partial response rate was 48.6% in Category-II patients and the no response rate was 50% in Category-III patients. Patients with hematological and neurological disorders recorded high clinical response rates, while rarer conditions showed low clinical response rates. A significant relationship was found between category and level of evidence and clinical response (p<0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of TPE is significantly associated with the ASFA category and the level of evidence of the indications. The findings of the present study highlight the need to refer to evidence-based guidelines when planning TPE procedures. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.12669/pjms.41.9.12597
dc.identifier.endpage 2469 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1682-024X
dc.identifier.issn 1681-715X
dc.identifier.issue 9 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 41070311
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105016518877
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 2463 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.9.12597
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/28776
dc.identifier.volume 41 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001588821000007
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Professional Medical Publications en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Category en_US
dc.subject Evidence-Based Medicine en_US
dc.subject Plasma Exchange en_US
dc.subject Treatment Outcome en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Clinical Response according to Category and Level of Evidence for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Indications: A Single-Center Experience en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files