Automated Analysis of Vertebral Body Surface Roughness for Adult Age Estimation: Ellipse Fitting and Machine-Learning Approach
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vertebral degenerative features are promising but often subjectively scored indicators for adult age estimation. We evaluated an objective surface roughness metric, the "average distance to the fitted ellipse" score (DS), calculated automatically for every vertebra from C7 to S1 on routine CT images. Methods: CT scans of 176 adults (94 males, 82 females; 21-94 years) were retrospectively analyzed. For each vertebra, the mean orthogonal deviation of the anterior superior endplate from an ideal ellipse was extracted. Sex-specific multiple linear regression served as a baseline; support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and Gaussian na & iuml;ve-Bayes pseudo-regressor (GNB-R) were tuned with 10-fold cross-validation and evaluated on a 20% hold-out set. Performance was quantified with the standard error of the estimate (SEE). Results: DS values correlated moderately to strongly with age (peak r = 0.60 at L3-L5). Linear regression explained 40% (males) and 47% (females) of age variance (SEE approximate to 11-12 years). Non-parametric learners improved precision: RF achieved an SEE of 8.49 years in males (R2 = 0.47), whereas k-NN attained 10.8 years (R2 = 0.45) in women. Conclusions: Automated analysis of vertebral cortical roughness provides a transparent, observer-independent means of estimating adult age with accuracy approaching that of more complex deep learning pipelines. Streamlining image preparation and validating the approach across diverse populations are the next steps toward forensic adoption.
Description
Etli, Yasin/0000-0002-7369-6083
ORCID
Keywords
Age Estimation, Vertebral Surface Roughness, Ellipse Fitting, Computed Tomography, Machine Learning, Forensic Radiology
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q2
Source
Diagnostics
Volume
15
Issue
14