Comparison of Classification Performances of Mars and Brt Data Methods: Ab?de-2016 Case

dc.contributor.author Sevgin, Hikmet
dc.contributor.author Onen, Emine
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:13:49Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:13:49Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Sevgin, Hikmet/0000-0002-9727-5865 en_US
dc.description.abstract This research examined the relationships between student, teacher, school and instructional qualifications and 8th grade students' science achievement, based on the conceptual framework created by Nilsen and Gustafsson (2016), using data mining methods MARS and BRT. Research data (n=10407 students, n=941 teachers and n=865 school administrators) were obtained from the AB??DE study conducted at the national level by the Ministry of National Education in 2016. MARS and BRT analyzes were performed in the SPM 8.2 program. The science achievement classification performances of these methods were compared by considering the correct classification rate, sensitivity and specificity rates, F1 statistical value and the area under the ROC curve. It was found that the BRT method was more successful than the MARS method in terms of all these criteria, and the most important predictors of science achievement were similar compared to these two methods. The results revealed that the most important predictors of science success are the student's perception of science self-efficacy, the father's occupation, the family's monthly income, the instructional activities of the teacher, the teacher's experience and preparation for the lesson, and the school administrators' perception of school climate. It is thought that the reason why BRT outperforms the MARS method in terms of the criteria considered in this study is that BRT learns from errors with the additive combination of various regression trees and provides a stronger classification performance by minimizing the errors that may occur in classification. This study revealed the benefits of using these two data mining methods in the field of Educational Sciences and discussed the contribution of the related methods in this field. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.15390/EB.2022.10575
dc.identifier.issn 1300-1337
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85140226882
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.10575
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/8306
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Turkish Education Assoc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Data Mining en_US
dc.subject Multivariate Adaptive Regression&Nbsp en_US
dc.subject Splines en_US
dc.subject Boosted Regression Trees en_US
dc.subject Ab?De en_US
dc.subject Science Achievement en_US
dc.title Comparison of Classification Performances of Mars and Brt Data Methods: Ab?de-2016 Case en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Sevgin, Hikmet/0000-0002-9727-5865
gdc.author.scopusid 57194170262
gdc.author.scopusid 57206262431
gdc.author.wosid Sevgin, Hikmet/Gpt-4207-2022
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Sevgin, Hikmet] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Educ Sci, Fac Educ, Van, Turkey; [Onen, Emine] Gazi Univ, Gazi Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 222 en_US
gdc.description.issue 211 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 195 en_US
gdc.description.volume 47 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Social Science Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000835321500009
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus

Files