Evaluation of Three Instrumentation Techniques at the Precision of Apical Stop and Apical Sealing of Obturation

dc.authorscopusid 22934316900
dc.authorscopusid 6603705031
dc.authorscopusid 8511651300
dc.authorwosid Alaçam, Tayfun/Aay-8739-2021
dc.authorwosid Sen, Ozgur/M-5939-2019
dc.contributor.author Genc, Ozgur
dc.contributor.author Alacam, Tayfun
dc.contributor.author Kayaoglu, Guven
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:26:19Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:26:19Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Alacam, Tayfun; Kayaoglu, Guven] Gazi Univ, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Fac Dent, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey; [Genc, Ozgur] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Fac Dent, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of two NiTi rotary apical preparation techniques used with an electronic apex locator-integrated endodontic motor and a manual technique to create an apical stop at a predetermined level (0.5 mm short of the apical foramen) in teeth with disrupted apical constriction, and to evaluate microleakage following obturation in such prepared teeth. Material and Methods: 85 intact human mandibular permanent incisors with single root canal were accessed and the apical constriction was disrupted using a #25 K-file. The teeth were embedded in alginate and instrumented to #40 using rotary Lightspeed or S-Apex techniques or stainless-steel K-files. Distance between the apical foramen and the created apical stop was measured to an accuracy of 0.01 mm. In another set of instrumented teeth, root canals were obturated using gutta-percha and sealer, and leakage was tested at 1 week and 3 months using a fluid filtration device. Results: All techniques performed slightly short of the predetermined level. Closest preparation to the predetermined level was with the manual technique and the farthest was with S-Apex. A significant difference was found between the performances of these two techniques (p<0.05). Lightspeed ranked in between. Leakage was similar for all techniques at either period. However, all groups leaked significantly more at 3 months compared to 1 week (p<0.05). Conclusions: Despite statistically significant differences found among the techniques, deviations from the predetermined level were small and clinically acceptable for all techniques. Leakage following obturation was comparable in all groups. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Gazi University en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was financially supported by the Gazi University Research Projects Fund. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.1590/S1678-77572011005000009
dc.identifier.endpage 354 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1678-7757
dc.identifier.issn 1678-7765
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 21655774
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-80053203535
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 350 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011005000009
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11615
dc.identifier.volume 19 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000299002300010
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Univ Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Dental Handpiece en_US
dc.subject Instrumentation en_US
dc.subject Leakage en_US
dc.subject Root Canal Preparation en_US
dc.title Evaluation of Three Instrumentation Techniques at the Precision of Apical Stop and Apical Sealing of Obturation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files