Proposal for an Index for Predicting the Success of Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Pilot Study

dc.contributor.author Celik, Sebahattin
dc.contributor.author Sumer, Aziz
dc.contributor.author Yavuz, Alpaslan
dc.contributor.author Zarbaliyev, Elbrus
dc.contributor.author Dundar, Ilyas
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:44:01Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:44:01Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description Dundar, Ilyas/0000-0002-1429-077X; Zarbaliyev, Elbrus/0000-0002-4595-8314 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Determining the relationship between remnant gastric volume (RGV) following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) remains a challenge. The components of RGV appear to play a much more important role than total RGV. We aimed to determine whether there is an optimal ratio between the components of RGV with respect to %EWL and to develop a statistical model to predict %EWL. Materials and Methods: This was a multicentric prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted between 2014 and 2016 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Two university-affiliated hospitals participated in this study. Patients who underwent LSG as treatment for obesity were enrolled in the study. Those who did not consent to postoperative computed tomography (CT) or whose postoperative CT images were not technically suitable for calculating volumes were excluded. Patients whose follow-up was incomplete were also excluded. Out of a total of 82 patients, 63 completed follow-ups and met the inclusion criteria. By dividing RGV into its components (the antrum and body parts), volumetric measurements were made using a novel CT-based software program. RGV was divided by the antrum volume to yield a ratio that we termed the "Sleeve Coefficient" (SC). Taking SC as an independent variable, nonlinear regression analysis was performed to determine the best model for curve estimation of %EWL. The radiologists who measured the RGV components were blinded to the outcomes. Results: The participants were primarily female (56F/7M), with a mean age of 35.9 (+/- 11.9) and a mean preoperative body mass index of 44.8 (+/- 7.4). The best fitted model for predicting %EWL in the second year was the cubic model. In the second year following LSG, the mean %EWL was 76.1% (+/- 18.2%). There was no significant correlation between total remnant volume and %EWL. Optimal %EWL was obtained when the mean SC was 3.3 +/- 1.5 (95% CI: 2.94-3.72). Conclusions: The ratio between RGV and antral (rather than total remaining stomach) volume appears to be of greater importance and utility in predicting %EWL and in managing LSG candidates. The proposed SC should be validated by further studies. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1089/bari.2018.0035
dc.identifier.issn 2168-023X
dc.identifier.issn 2168-0248
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85063289607
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2018.0035
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/16048
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mary Ann Liebert, inc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Sleeve Gastrectomy en_US
dc.subject Weight Loss en_US
dc.subject Remnant Gastric Volume en_US
dc.title Proposal for an Index for Predicting the Success of Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Pilot Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Dundar, Ilyas/0000-0002-1429-077X
gdc.author.id Zarbaliyev, Elbrus/0000-0002-4595-8314
gdc.author.scopusid 36774252500
gdc.author.scopusid 26653741600
gdc.author.scopusid 55682194900
gdc.author.scopusid 57202391684
gdc.author.scopusid 56872880400
gdc.author.wosid Yavuz, Alpaslan/H-3947-2014
gdc.author.wosid Sümer, Aziz/Ahh-3357-2022
gdc.author.wosid Zarbaliyev, Elbrus/Abi-6068-2020
gdc.author.wosid Dundar, Ilyas/Aba-7303-2020
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Celik, Sebahattin] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Fac Med, Van, Turkey; [Sumer, Aziz] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, Bariatric Metab Surg Clin, Gaziosmanpasa Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yavuz, Alpaslan; Dundar, Ilyas] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Van, Turkey; [Zarbaliyev, Elbrus] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Gaziosmanpasa Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey; [Celik, Sebahattin] Istinye Univ Med Pk, Dept Gen Surg, Gaziosmanpasa Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 24 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q4
gdc.description.startpage 17 en_US
gdc.description.volume 14 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000448374200001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus

Files