Comparative Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy, Kinesio Taping and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Acute Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome

dc.authorscopusid 35113969100
dc.contributor.author Şah, V.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:54:46Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:54:46Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Şah V., Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Conservative Physical Therapy (CPT), Kinesio Taping (KT), and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) have been used to treat Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome (UTMPS). In a health center where all three treatments can be performed, it is important to choose the most effective one in UTMPS treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CPT, KT, and ESWT in the patients with UTMPS. 84 patients with acute UTMPS were randomised into three treatment groups: CPT, KT, and ESWT. All patients were evaluated at baseline (week 0), just after treatment (week 2) and one month after treatment (week 6). Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Restricted Angel of Cervical Extansion (RACE), Restricted Angel of Cervical Lateral Flexion (RACLF) scores were used as outcome measures. All outcome measures just after treatment (week 2) and one month after treatment (week 6) were found to b e significantly lower within the three treatment groups compared with the baseline (week 0) (for all, p<0.05). All outcome measures one month after the treatment (week 6) were found to be significantly lower in the ESWT group than in the other two treatment groups (for all, p<0.05). CPT, KT, ESWT were found to be effective in the treatment of UTMPS. However, since ESWT has the most positive effect on outcome measures in the evaluation 1 month after the treatment (week 6), it can be preferred over the other two methods (CPT and KT) in the treatment of UTMPS.1 month after the treatment (week 6), it can be preferred over the other two methods (CPT and KT) in the treatment of UTMPS. © 2023, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/ejm.2023.62558
dc.identifier.endpage 114 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0883
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85151617157
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 107 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1179466
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2023.62558
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/3251
dc.identifier.volume 28 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.institutionauthor Şah, V.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eastern Journal of Medicine en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Conventional Physical Therapy en_US
dc.subject Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy en_US
dc.subject Kinesio Taping en_US
dc.subject Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome en_US
dc.title Comparative Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy, Kinesio Taping and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Acute Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files