Comparison of Three Video-Assisted Intubation Methods: Rigid Telescopes, C-Mac, Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy, for Anticipated Difficult Airways

dc.contributor.author Cetin, Yaser Said
dc.contributor.author Soyalp, Celaleddin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:36:24Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:36:24Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Cetin, Yaser Said/0000-0002-7684-4600 en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and reliability of rigid telescopes with the two most used video-assisted intubation techniques. The primary outcome of the study is the first attempt orotracheal intubation success rate and the secondary outcomes include intubation time, mucosal injury, and complications during intubation. Materials and methods: All patients that were predicted to have difficult intubation were prepared according to the video-assisted intubation technique and were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 (REI group; n = 49) included patients that were intubated using rigid endoscope-assisted orotracheal intubation (REI) (0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 70 degrees), 18-cm rigid telescope, full-HD camera, and Macintosh blade. Group 2 (V-MAC Group; n = 51) included patients that underwent tracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope Macintosh (V-MAC). Group 3 (FFEI group; n = 53) included patients that underwent flexible fiberoptic tracheal intubation. Groups were compared with regard to intubation success rate, intubation time, number of intubation attempts, and intubation-related complications. Results: The study included a total of 153 patients aged 18-60 years who were predicted to have difficult intubation and underwent intubation with phonomicrosurgery and general anesthesia under elective conditions. Demographic and airway findings of the groups were similar, and no significant difference was found among the groups with regard to the number of intubation attempts (p > 0.05). Intubation was successful at the first attempt in 110 (72%), at the second attempt in 26 (17%), and at the third attempt in 17 (11%) patients. No significant difference was found among the three groups with regard to the number of intubation attempts (p > 0.05). Intubation time was significantly longer in the FFEI group compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). The prevalence of mucosal injury to vocal cords was significantly lower in the REI group compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rigid telescopes can be considered in elective surgeries of patients predicted to have difficult airway since they allow for rapid assessment of the airway, minimal mucosal damage, and rapid intubation. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.tacc.2022.02.003
dc.identifier.issn 2210-8440
dc.identifier.issn 2210-8467
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85126820049
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2022.02.003
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/14079
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Airway Management en_US
dc.subject Difficult Airway en_US
dc.subject Tracheal Intubation en_US
dc.subject Videolaryngoscopy en_US
dc.subject Surgical Equipment en_US
dc.subject Laryngoscopes en_US
dc.subject Intraoperative Complications en_US
dc.title Comparison of Three Video-Assisted Intubation Methods: Rigid Telescopes, C-Mac, Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy, for Anticipated Difficult Airways en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Cetin, Yaser Said/0000-0002-7684-4600
gdc.author.scopusid 57202732676
gdc.author.scopusid 57188818804
gdc.author.wosid Cetin, Yaser/Aac-8563-2020
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Cetin, Yaser Said] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, TR-65080 Van, Turkey; [Soyalp, Celaleddin] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 37 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 33 en_US
gdc.description.volume 43 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000798983100009
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus

Files