Is a Single Dose of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Sufficient to Prevent Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty
| dc.contributor.author | Güven, Necip | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dündar, Abdulrahim | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Sehmuz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ünal, Yunus Can | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-01T20:06:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-01T20:06:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,Hitit Üniversitesi,Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Introduction: Prosthetic infection is a serious complication that can develop after knee and hip arthroplasty and remains a common reason for revision surgery. Guidelines recommend various measures to prevent infection, howewer some professional associat ions argue that there is insufficient evidence for single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Our study compares the outcomes of patients receiving short - and long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in arthroplasty surgery. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study of 424 patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, two prophylaxis protocols were compared. Group 1 (190 patients, 44.8%) received cefazolin pre- and postoperatively on day 1, while group 2 (234 patients, 55.2%) received extended cefazolin (5 days postoperatively) and oral amoxicillin clavulanic acid (5 days). Early postoperative infection rates wer e evaluated. Results: In this study, 83.4% of 424 patients who underwent total knee and hip arthroplasty were female. Knee and hip operations were performed in 86.8% and 13.2% of the patients, respectively. The mean age did not show a statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of periprosthetic infection rates (p=0.828). Posto perative wound complications were seen in 34 (18%) patients in group 1 and 44 (19%) patients in group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.704). No significant difference in wound complications and prosthesis infection rates was fo und between group 1 and group 2 patients with risk factors (p>0.05). Conclusion: In primary joint arthroplasty, extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis did not provide additional protection against single -day antibiotic prophylaxis. The results were similar in both risk and non-risk groups. Considering antibiotic resistance, side effects and costs, it is concluded that extended prophylaxis is unnecessary. However, further large -scale studies on this subject are required. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5505/vmj.2024.72691 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 260 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1300-2694 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2587-0351 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105003435162 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 255 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1358683 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5505/vmj.2024.72691 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1358683/is-a-single-dose-of-antibiotic-prophylaxis-sufficient-to-prevent-infections-in-total-joint-arthroplasty | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Van Tıp Dergisi | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Antibiotic Prophylaxis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Arthroplasty | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hip Replacement | en_US |
| dc.subject | Knee Replacement | en_US |
| dc.subject | Prosthesis-Related Infections | en_US |
| dc.title | Is a Single Dose of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Sufficient to Prevent Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article |