Is a Single Dose of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Sufficient to Prevent Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty

dc.contributor.author Güven, Necip
dc.contributor.author Dündar, Abdulrahim
dc.contributor.author Kaya, Sehmuz
dc.contributor.author Ünal, Yunus Can
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-01T20:06:54Z
dc.date.available 2025-06-01T20:06:54Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,Hitit Üniversitesi,Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.description.abstract Abstract Introduction: Prosthetic infection is a serious complication that can develop after knee and hip arthroplasty and remains a common reason for revision surgery. Guidelines recommend various measures to prevent infection, howewer some professional associat ions argue that there is insufficient evidence for single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Our study compares the outcomes of patients receiving short - and long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in arthroplasty surgery. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study of 424 patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, two prophylaxis protocols were compared. Group 1 (190 patients, 44.8%) received cefazolin pre- and postoperatively on day 1, while group 2 (234 patients, 55.2%) received extended cefazolin (5 days postoperatively) and oral amoxicillin clavulanic acid (5 days). Early postoperative infection rates wer e evaluated. Results: In this study, 83.4% of 424 patients who underwent total knee and hip arthroplasty were female. Knee and hip operations were performed in 86.8% and 13.2% of the patients, respectively. The mean age did not show a statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of periprosthetic infection rates (p=0.828). Posto perative wound complications were seen in 34 (18%) patients in group 1 and 44 (19%) patients in group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.704). No significant difference in wound complications and prosthesis infection rates was fo und between group 1 and group 2 patients with risk factors (p>0.05). Conclusion: In primary joint arthroplasty, extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis did not provide additional protection against single -day antibiotic prophylaxis. The results were similar in both risk and non-risk groups. Considering antibiotic resistance, side effects and costs, it is concluded that extended prophylaxis is unnecessary. However, further large -scale studies on this subject are required. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/vmj.2024.72691
dc.identifier.endpage 260 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-2694
dc.identifier.issn 2587-0351
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105003435162
dc.identifier.scopusquality N/A
dc.identifier.startpage 255 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 1358683
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/vmj.2024.72691
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1358683/is-a-single-dose-of-antibiotic-prophylaxis-sufficient-to-prevent-infections-in-total-joint-arthroplasty
dc.identifier.volume 31 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Van Tıp Dergisi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Antibiotic Prophylaxis en_US
dc.subject Arthroplasty en_US
dc.subject Hip Replacement en_US
dc.subject Knee Replacement en_US
dc.subject Prosthesis-Related Infections en_US
dc.title Is a Single Dose of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Sufficient to Prevent Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article

Files