Comparison of Robotic and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical Technique Procedures in Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy During Endometrial Cancer Surgery

dc.authorscopusid 57204285254
dc.authorscopusid 55573979300
dc.authorscopusid 57203359912
dc.authorscopusid 60080401600
dc.authorscopusid 58500795100
dc.authorscopusid 54383079000
dc.authorscopusid 54784975400
dc.contributor.author Simsek, Erkan
dc.contributor.author Karakaş, Sema
dc.contributor.author Karaaslan, Onur
dc.contributor.author Akdeniz Yildiz, Özge
dc.contributor.author Gündüz, Sadık
dc.contributor.author Demirayak, Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Comba, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-30T16:36:05Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-30T16:36:05Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Simsek] Erkan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; [Karakaş] Sema, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Karaaslan] Onur, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Turkey; [Akdeniz Yildiz] Özge, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; [Gündüz] Sadık, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; [Demirayak] Gökhan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Üsküdar Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Comba] Cihan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Özdemir] İsa Aykut, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Yaşar] Levent, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The role of sentinel lymph node dissection in the surgical management of endometrial cancer limited to the uterus is gaining recognition. The safety and applicability of two methods were assessed by examining the results of our patients in the identification of the sentinel lymph node during endometrial cancer surgery. The methods were robotic surgery, a critical component of minimally invasive surgery, and the vNOTES (Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Technique), which has recently been introduced for malignant indications. Methods: Patients who had endometrial cancer surgery at our center employing robotic and vNOTES technologies between January 2023 and June 2024 were included in this retrospective study. We conducted the dissection of sentinel lymph nodes utilizing a near-infrared technology camera method with indocyanine green (ICG) in both robotic and vNOTES techniques. The patients' records were retrospectively obtained from patient files and hospital records. Among the 76 patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer, 24 were treated with vNOTES surgery, whereas 52 received robotic surgery. Results: No statistically significant differences were seen between the two groups for age (p = 0.447), body mass index (p = 0.506), prior abdominal operations (p = 0.209), predicted blood loss (p = 0.155), and surgical duration (p = 0.298). The detection rates of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were similar across the groups: 97 % (n = 50) in the robotic group and 96 % (n = 23) in the vNOTES group (p = 0.493). The only statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative pain scores at the 12th hour, which were lower in the vNOTES group (p = 0.023). Conclusion: The vNOTES technique demonstrates comparable sentinel lymph node detection rates to robotic surgery in the management of uterine endometrial cancer. Moreover, it has the advantage of markedly less postoperative discomfort. vNOTES is a secure and efficacious minimally invasive option, especially for patients with comorbidities or those deemed unsuitable for robotic surgery. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102282
dc.identifier.issn 1879-3320
dc.identifier.issn 0960-7404
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105014755765
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102282
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/28601
dc.identifier.volume 63 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Surgical Oncology-Oxford en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Endometrial Cancer en_US
dc.subject Minimally Invasive Surgery en_US
dc.subject Robotic Surgery en_US
dc.subject Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy en_US
dc.subject V-NOTES en_US
dc.subject Indocyanine Green (ICG) en_US
dc.subject Da Vinci Xi System en_US
dc.subject Adult en_US
dc.subject Article en_US
dc.subject Bleeding en_US
dc.subject Body Mass Index (BMI) en_US
dc.subject Comorbidity en_US
dc.subject Endometrium en_US
dc.subject Female en_US
dc.subject Hospitalization en_US
dc.subject Human Tissue en_US
dc.subject ICU Stay en_US
dc.subject Length of Stay en_US
dc.subject Lung Function en_US
dc.subject Lymph Node Dissection en_US
dc.subject Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) en_US
dc.subject Operation Duration en_US
dc.subject Pain Assessment en_US
dc.subject Postoperative Pain en_US
dc.subject Retrospective Study en_US
dc.subject Robot-Assisted Surgery en_US
dc.title Comparison of Robotic and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical Technique Procedures in Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy During Endometrial Cancer Surgery en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files