Comparison of the Techniques of the Microscopic Varicocelectomy and Inguinal Varicocelectomy

dc.contributor.author Pirincci, Necip
dc.contributor.author Gecit, Man
dc.contributor.author Curies, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Taken, Kerem
dc.contributor.author Canbeyt, Ozcan
dc.contributor.author Ceylanl, Kadir
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:48:33Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:48:33Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.description Gunes, Mustafa/0000-0003-2044-9086 en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: The aim is to compare the results of two different varicocelectomy techniques. Material and Method: Between July 2005 and February 2011; 68 patients who are of 84 varicocele whose ages were ranged from 15 to 39 (26.4 +/- 6) and whom inguinal varicocelectomy or subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy were performed due to the clinical varicocele were retrospectively evaluated. The complication rates; preoperative and postoperative sperm parameters and pregnancy rates of both groups were evaluated and compared. Results: The duration of the operation in the subinguinal microscopic group was significantly long compared to the inguinal group. Hydrocelectomy and the recurrence of varicocele were not observed in the subinguinal microscopic group; hydrocele in 3 cases and the recurrence of varicocele in 5 cases were detected in the inguinal group. The difference in between was significant. There was a recovery of 75% in the number of sperm and / or movement in the subinguinal microscopic group and a recovery of 64% in the inguinal group; these values were statistically significant comparable level in both group. The rates of the pregnancy in the first year was 29% in the subinguinal microscopic group and was 26% in the inguinal group; there was no significant difference among the pregnancy rates between both groups. Discussion: Subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy has yielded better results with low complication and higher success rates compared to the inguinal varicocelectomy. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.4328/JCAM.790
dc.identifier.issn 1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn 1309-2014
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85015893586
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.790
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/1579
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher derman Medical Publ en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Inguinal en_US
dc.subject Microsurgery en_US
dc.subject Subinguinal en_US
dc.subject Varicocele en_US
dc.subject Varicocelectomy en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Techniques of the Microscopic Varicocelectomy and Inguinal Varicocelectomy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Gunes, Mustafa/0000-0003-2044-9086
gdc.author.scopusid 9244561200
gdc.author.scopusid 8720316900
gdc.author.scopusid 35769316200
gdc.author.scopusid 36524209300
gdc.author.scopusid 57193700299
gdc.author.scopusid 55544251500
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Pirincci, Necip; Gecit, Man; Curies, Mustafa; Ceylanl, Kadir] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Urol Anabilim Dali, Tip Fak, Maras Caddesi, TR-65100 Van, Turkey; [Taken, Kerem; Canbeyt, Ozcan] Van Eigitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Urol Klin, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 411 en_US
gdc.description.issue 4 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 409 en_US
gdc.description.volume 3 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000215547600007
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus

Files